Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,366 Skills
Guides senior front-end software engineering—TypeScript/React/Next.js architecture, component design, client and server rendering, state and data fetching, styling and design systems, accessibility (WCAG), performance (Core Web Vitals), testing, and senior-level UI code review. Use when building or refactoring complex UIs, designing component APIs, optimizing LCP/INP/CLS, implementing accessible interactions, integrating design tokens, or reviewing front-end PRs—not for backend APIs or databases (fullstack-software-engineer, senior-fullstack-developer), design-only critiques without implementation, CI/CD (devops), or cross-service system RFCs (senior-software-engineer). For implementing screens from design specs, component states, and visual QA, use ui-software-engineer. Deep perf investigations and load/RUM analysis: performance-engineer.
Use when building a quarterly bookings forecast, ARR projection, pipeline forecast, NRR projection, or commit/best-case/pipe-only board number — especially when the CRO needs to walk the board through funnel math + cohort ARR + per-stage conversion assumptions without the theatre of a single undefended number. Decomposes pipeline into commit, best-case, and pipe-only tiers; projects cohort-level NRR/GRR to surface leaky cohorts before they show up in the consolidated number; scores per-stage funnel confidence so soft-floor stages get treated differently from high-confidence ones. Every output explicitly names the conversion rate used, the data window, and the weighting choice. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, VP Sales, and CRO at quarterly forecast or board prep. NOT financial close (see finance/financial-analysis). NOT strategic CRO hiring/territory (see c-level-advisor/cro-advisor). NOT pricing (see sibling pricing-strategist).
Guardião da qualidade de código e entregas no SynkOS. Use esta skill quando o usuário pedir para revisar código implementado, executar gates de qualidade, fazer code review, validar se uma story atende os critérios de aceite, checar segurança (OWASP), ou fazer perguntas como "revise o código da story X", "o que passou no gate de qualidade?", "há problemas de segurança?", "a implementação cobre os critérios de aceite?", "rode o code review automatizado". Ative também para documentar findings com severidade, decidir PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED para stories, e devolver ao dev com checklist de correções quando a story falha.
Generate a complete multichannel outbound campaign — a full sequence of LinkedIn and email messages — from a natural-language brief. Use whenever the user wants to write an outreach campaign, create a prospecting sequence, draft a multichannel sequence, write cold emails and LinkedIn messages, build a social-selling, employee-advocacy or cold-outbound campaign, or rewrite an existing campaign. Triggers on: 'write me a campaign', 'build a sequence', 'multichannel campaign', 'cold outbound sequence', 'social selling', 'employee advocacy', 'post engagers outreach', 'webinar follow-up', 'LinkedIn + email sequence'. Produces 3 angle options, then the full sequence with every message ready to copy, calibrated to the campaign type and channel mix, and self-checked against copywriting quality standards. For SDR, BDR, RevOps, Growth, Head of Sales/Marketing and founders running outbound. Maintained by La Growth Machine.
Validar prompts dirigidos a agentes de IA (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, etc.) contra reglas de redacción efectiva. Calcular un porcentaje de efectividad del prompt y devolver sugerencias de mejora concretas, más una propuesta de prompt reescrito. Cubre verbos no imperativos, lenguaje conversacional, acciones vagas, términos subjetivos, alcance difuso, prohibiciones implícitas, intenciones múltiples y nombres genéricos. Las reglas de detalle técnico (alcance, nombres exactos) se aplican solo a prompts de implementación; en prompts funcionales (user stories, descripciones de comportamiento) se marcan N/A. Usar siempre que el usuario pida validar, revisar, auditar, mejorar, corregir o "pulir" un prompt antes de enviarlo a un agente, o cuando pegue un prompt y pida feedback sobre cómo está redactado.
Adds user authentication to web and mobile apps with Amazon Cognito (user pools and identity pools) and the AWS Amplify client auth libraries. Covers sign-up/sign-in flows and the login page (Cognito-hosted UI / managed login), MFA, password policies, OAuth 2.0 / OIDC flows (auth-code + PKCE, client credentials), social/SAML federation, tokens (ID/access/refresh, rotation, revocation, storage), Cognito Lambda triggers, identity pools (temp AWS creds), and gating API Gateway (or ALB) routes to signed-in users via Cognito/JWT authorizers. Applies when adding a login or sign-up page, configuring a user pool or app client, choosing user pool vs identity pool, wiring social/SAML, refreshing tokens, requiring sign-in on an API Gateway or ALB, or debugging redirect_uri/token/MFA/CORS/federation errors. Does NOT cover Amplify Gen2 backend definitions (defineAuth, npx ampx → aws-amplify), IAM/STS/Identity Center (→ aws-iam), or API Gateway/Lambda resource config beyond the authorizer (→ aws-serverless).
End-to-end implementation guide for adding Whop licensing to apps with a secure backend, activation flow, and webhook synchronization. Use when tasks involve Whop checkout setup, membership/license activation, validate_license integration, webhook signature verification, revocation handling, device-binding policies, or periodic license checks in Node.js, Python, iOS, or macOS apps.
GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, build and test strategies, and deployment patterns
Effectue des revues de code complètes des merge requests GitLab, analysant la qualité du code, la sécurité, les performances et les bonnes pratiques. À utiliser quand l'utilisateur dit « code review » ou demande de revoir des merge requests ou d'analyser les changements d'une branche avant fusion.
Cross-meeting archaeology skill. Consumes multiple meeting recaps (or raw notes) over a period and surfaces patterns invisible in any single meeting. Shows how decisions evolved, who has been saying what, where threads are stalling, and where contradictions have emerged. Produces a plain-text timeline, themes with confidence markers, stakeholder position tracking, consolidated decision list, contradiction flags, open items, narrative summary, and prioritized follow-ups.
- **Role**: You are the governor of self-improving software. Your mandate is to enable autonomous system evolution (finding faster, cheaper, smarter ways to execute tasks) while mathematically guar...
Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.