Loading...
Loading...
Found 99 Skills
Go-specific code review with 6-phase methodology: Context, Automated Checks, Quality Analysis, Specific Analysis, Line-by-Line, Documentation. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or auditing Go codebases for quality and best practices. Use for "review Go", "Go PR", "check Go code", "Go quality", "review .go". Do NOT use for writing new Go code, debugging Go bugs, or refactoring -- use golang-general-engineer, systematic-debugging, or systematic-refactoring for those tasks.
Process external code review feedback with technical rigor. Use when receiving feedback from another LLM, human reviewer, or CI tool. Verifies claims before implementing, tracks disposition.
Identifies silent failures, inadequate error handling, and inappropriate fallback behavior in code. Zero tolerance for errors that occur without proper logging and user feedback. Triggers: When reviewing error handling, checking for silent failures, analyzing catch blocks. Examples: - "Review the error handling" -> audits all error handling in recent changes - "Check for silent failures" -> hunts for swallowed errors and empty catch blocks - "Analyze catch blocks in this PR" -> reviews every try-catch for adequacy - "Are there any hidden failures?" -> finds errors that get silently ignored
Use when the user asks to create a CodeTour .tour file — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: create a tour, onboarding tour, architecture tour, PR review tour, explain how X works, vibe check, RCA tour, contributor guide, or any structured code walkthrough request.
Audit codebases with full recognition and PR review for uncommitted changes. Detects SEO issues, technical problems, security vulnerabilities, accessibility issues, performance bottlenecks, and more. Supports Normal, Strict, and Expert modes with Complete Audit or PR Review options.
Perform a code review with linting, standards checking, and priority-ranked findings
Guides Android code reviews with type-specific checklists and MVVM/Compose pattern validation. Use when reviewing Android PRs, pull requests, diffs, or local changes involving Kotlin, ViewModel, Composable, Repository, or Gradle files. Triggered by "review PR", "review changes", "check this code", "Android review", or code review requests mentioning bitwarden/android. Loads specialized checklists for feature additions, bug fixes, UI refinements, refactoring, dependency updates, and infrastructure changes.
AI-powered code review via the OpenAI Codex CLI. This skill should be used when reviewing branch diffs before merging a PR, auditing uncommitted changes during development, inspecting a specific commit, performing custom-scoped reviews, or whenever changes touch security-sensitive paths or exhibit risky patterns.
Review Argos visual regression builds as one input to a pull request review. Use when a PR has an Argos build link, an Argos status check, or a bot comment pointing to an Argos build, and you need to decide whether the visual diffs match the developer's intent before approving.
Systematic workflow for addressing PR review comments using gh-pr-review CLI. Use when the user wants to work through PR review comments and prefers the gh-pr-review tool over helper scripts.
Use when monitoring a PR (or a full Graphite stack of PRs) that needs CI fixes or review comment responses. Runs as a long-running session with intelligent sleep intervals. Handles failing checks, reviewer feedback, and pushes verified fixes autonomously.
Analyze code changes for security vulnerabilities using LLM reasoning and threat model patterns. Use for PR reviews, pre-commit checks, or branch comparisons.