Loading...
Loading...
Found 60 Skills
Comprehensive academic writing skill for drafting journal-ready manuscripts. Orchestrates specialized sub-skills for introduction sections (q-intro), descriptive analysis (q-descriptive-analysis), methods sections (q-methods), and results sections (q-results). Use when the user needs end-to-end support for academic manuscript preparation, from initial data exploration through publication-ready prose. Follows APA 7th edition formatting standards.
Use this when the user explicitly requests to "verify/optimize in-text citations of the `{topic}_review.tex` review" or to "run check-review-alignment". Use the host AI's semantic understanding to verify each citation against the literature content one by one. **Only when fatal citation errors are found**, make minimal rewrites to the "sentences containing citations", and reuse the rendering script of `systematic-literature-review` to output PDF/Word (the script does not directly call the LLM API locally). Core principle: **Do not modify for the sake of modifying**. When it is uncertain whether it is a fatal error, keep the original content and issue a warning in the report. ⚠️ Not applicable in the following cases: - The user only wants to generate the main body of a systematic review (should use systematic-literature-review) - The user only wants to add/verify BibTeX entries (should use a dedicated bib management process)
Iteratively write academic documents (paper sections, research proposals, technical documents) with quality improvement loop. Uses academic-planner for structure design and academic-reviewer for quality evaluation. Ensures no hallucinations through fact verification.
Run the proofreading protocol on lecture files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files.
Generate publication-quality LaTeX tables from experimental results. Convert JSON/CSV data to booktabs-styled tables with bold best results, multi-row layouts, and proper captions. Use when creating result tables, comparison tables, or ablation tables for papers.
Write Related Work sections that compare and contrast prior work with your approach. Organize by theme, cite broadly, and explain how your work differs. Use when writing or improving the Related Work section of a paper.
Adopts the rigorous, witty, and data-dense persona of a Sub-millimetre (sub-mm) Astrophysicist. Ideal for technical documentation, academic summaries, or transforming mundane topics into high-stakes scientific discourse.
Draft or refine introduction sections for academic manuscripts using an interview-driven workflow. Use when the user needs to write or refine an introduction for research papers. Produces clear, flowing prose that establishes context, identifies gaps, frames research questions, previews methods, and articulates contributions. Follows a structured approach from phenomenon to theory to empirical contribution.
Akademiskt skrivande med vetenskaplig stringens — svenska eller engelska. [VAD] Uppsatser, rapporter, avhandlingar, litteraturöversikter, papers enligt högskolestandarder. IMRAD-struktur, Harvard/APA-referenshantering. Tvåspråkig skill. [NÄR] Use when: akademisk, vetenskaplig, uppsats, rapport, avhandling, litteraturöversikt, forskningstext, Harvard-referens, APA-referens, kandidat, master, doktorand, paper, thesis [SPRÅK] Svenska eller engelska — matcha input eller fråga [EXPERTISE] Academic writing, methodology, source criticism, qualitative/quantitative (SV/EN)
Draft publication-ready Results/Findings sections for quantitative sociology articles. Guides cluster selection, arc construction, paragraph-level moves, and writing techniques based on genre analysis of 83 Social Problems/Social Forces articles across secondary-survey, administrative-data, and content-analysis methods. Use when the user wants to write, draft, or revise a Results section for a quantitative or content-analysis paper. Also use when the user asks for help structuring findings, organizing results, or translating statistical output into publication-ready prose.
Identify your article's contribution type and generate a cross-section vocabulary threading template. Feeds into argument-builder, article-bookends, and abstract-builder for consistent framing across all sections. Based on analysis of 197 articles from AJS, ASR, Social Problems, Social Forces, Social Movement Studies, and Mobilization.
Build bibliographies from manuscript citations by extracting in-text citations, matching them against a references.bib file, identifying issues, and generating a formatted reference list.