Loading...
Loading...
Found 115 Skills
Run comprehensive PR checks including reviewing CodeRabbit comments, ensuring PR description quality, running pre-commit hooks, tests, and validation. Use on an existing PR to address review feedback.
Check all staged files for stale @context annotations before committing. Use as a pre-commit verification step.
Selects, configures, and integrates a static analysis tool for the project's language. Covers tool selection, rule configuration, CI integration, fixing existing violations, and pre-commit hook setup. Invoked when the user asks to add linting, set up static analysis, or configure a code quality tool.
Implement Supabase lint rules, policy enforcement, and automated guardrails. Use when setting up code quality rules for Supabase integrations, implementing pre-commit hooks, or configuring CI policy checks for Supabase best practices. Trigger with phrases like "supabase policy", "supabase lint", "supabase guardrails", "supabase best practices check", "supabase eslint".
One-time project onboarding for swain. Migrates existing CLAUDE.md content to AGENTS.md (with the @AGENTS.md include pattern), verifies vendored tk (ticket) for task tracking, configures pre-commit security hooks (gitleaks default), and offers to add swain governance rules. Run once when adopting swain in a new project — use swain-doctor for ongoing per-session health checks.
Implement Git hooks using Husky, pre-commit, and custom scripts. Enforce code quality, linting, and testing before commits and pushes.
Invoke this skill when a user shares test code and questions whether it actually works as intended — not to run or fix the test, but to evaluate whether the test has real value. Triggers on: "is this test any good?", "would this catch a real bug?", "this test always passes — is that normal?", "review these tests before I commit", or "does this test verify anything meaningful?". Also triggers when someone suspects a test is useless, wants a pre-commit quality gate, or is unsure if an auto-generated test is worth keeping. The core question this skill answers: "Would this test fail if the feature broke?" If not, the test gets rejected. Do NOT use for generating new tests, fixing failing tests, or exploring application features.
Configure a PreToolUse hook to prevent AI agents from skipping git pre-commit hooks with --no-verify and other bypass flags. Use when setting up Claude Code projects that enforce commit quality gates.
Create git commits in Conventional Commits format. Estimate type/scope from staged changes, detect breaking changes and secret leaks (such as .env files). Must pass pre-commit hooks (`--no-verify` is not allowed). Use with instructions like "commit", "git commit", "record changes".
Set up and maintain hk git hook manager in any repository. Use when adding pre-commit hooks, configuring linters, setting up code quality automation, working with hk.pkl, or maintaining existing hook configurations. Triggers on tasks involving hk, git hooks, pre-commit checks, commit-msg validation, or linting pipelines.
Fix Python code formatting issues using the Ruff formatter. Use when: (1) Formatting errors are detected by ruff format --check, (2) Python files need to be formatted to match project style, (3) Pre-commit hooks or CI fail due to formatting issues.
Use when the user asks to commit changes. Analyzes diffs deeply to draft intelligent conventional commit messages, detects scope from branch names and file paths, runs pre-commit quality checks (TypeScript, ESLint, Prettier), scans for secrets and debug artifacts, splits unrelated changes into separate commits, and verifies success. Invoke via /commit or when user says "commit", "commit this", "make a commit".