Loading...
Loading...
Found 206 Skills
Research-driven code review and validation at multiple levels of abstraction. Two modes: (1) Session review — after making changes, review and verify work using parallel reviewers that research-validate every assumption; (2) Full codebase audit — deep end-to-end evaluation using parallel teams of subagent-spawning reviewers. Use when reviewing changes, verifying work quality, auditing a codebase, validating correctness, checking assumptions, finding defects, reducing complexity. NOT for writing new code, explaining code, or benchmarking.
Unified code review system — dispatches the right review agents for the situation. Use when reviewing code for quality, bugs, compliance, or before merging.
Execute implementation plan tasks with TDD workflow, auto-commit, and phase gates. Use when user says "build it", "start building", "execute plan", "implement tasks", "ship it", or references a track ID. Do NOT use for planning (use /plan) or scaffolding (use /scaffold).
Establish design review gates with criteria, checklists, and approval workflows.
Multi-layer quality assurance with 5-layer verification pyramid (Rules → Functional → Visual → Integration → Quality Scoring). Independent verification with LLM-as-judge and Agent-as-a-Judge patterns. Score 0-100 with ≥90 threshold. Use when verifying code quality, security scanning, preventing test gaming, comprehensive QA, or ensuring production readiness through multi-layer validation.
Checks email quality before sending via Mailgun Inspect API. Use when previewing emails across clients, checking accessibility (WCAG), validating links, validating images, or analyzing email HTML/CSS compatibility.
Multi-dimensional code review with structured reports. Analyzes correctness, readability, performance, security, testing, and architecture. Triggers on "review code", "code review", "审查代码", "代码审查".
Comprehensive multi-dimensional skill reviews across structure, content, quality, usability, and integration. Task-based operations with automated validation, manual assessment, scoring rubrics, and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing skills, ensuring quality, validating production readiness, identifying improvements, or conducting quality assurance.
Comprehensive documentation of Claude's capabilities for visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, and quality assurance automation. Use when setting up testing infrastructure, implementing visual regression, or understanding agent testing capabilities. (project)
Use Codex CLI for sandboxed auditing, debugging, and autonomous prototyping
Defense-in-depth verification before declaring any task complete. Run tests, check build, validate changed files, verify no regressions. Applies 4-level adversarial artifact verification (EXISTS > SUBSTANTIVE > WIRED > DATA FLOWS) with goal-backward framing. Use before saying "done", "fixed", or "complete" on any code change. Use for "verify", "make sure it works", "check before committing", or "validate changes". Do NOT use for debugging (use systematic-debugging) or code review (use systematic-code-review).
Grill the diff. Specialists evaluate every finding internally — only high-value findings reach the user for discussion until reaching shared understanding.