Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,993 Skills
Define the structural layer of a product or site before visual design begins. Covers navigation, content hierarchy, page structure, URL patterns, and user flows. Use when user wants to plan site structure, define navigation, map user flows, organize content, or mentions "IA" or "information architecture".
Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests.
Build a new API connector or provider by matching the target repo's existing integration pattern exactly. Use when adding one more integration without inventing a second architecture.
Choose the right Zoom architecture for a use case. Use when deciding between REST API, Webhooks, WebSockets, Meeting SDK, Video SDK, Zoom Apps SDK, Zoom MCP, Phone, Contact Center, or a hybrid approach.
Decide when Zoom MCP is the right fit and produce a safe setup plan for Claude. Use when planning AI workflows over Zoom data, deciding between MCP and REST, or defining a hybrid MCP architecture.
Draft or update architecture documents under `easysdd/architecture/` — describe what a subsystem/module looks like currently, how it is divided, and how external interfaces operate, to provide pre-positioning input for subsequent feature-design. Information sources include code + user materials (oral accounts, scattered documents, compound deposits, existing decisions), and the output can be reverse-validated by anchoring to specific `file:line`. Two modes: new (draft a new architecture document from scratch), update (refresh an existing document based on the latest code status and new user materials). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: user says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "update the architecture directory", "write down the structure of this module", or when it is found that "something that should be in the architecture is missing" during the feature-design / feature-acceptance phase.
Conduct an architecture health check on a design — either verify if the design is internally consistent (no conflicts between terminology, contracts, and implementation steps) or check if the design aligns with the code (ensuring what was promised in the design is actually implemented in code). This skill only outputs issue lists and repair suggestions, and does not make any modifications. It focuses on only one target each time; "顺手把另一项也查了" is not allowed. Trigger scenarios: Users say "perform architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan align with the code?", or want to conduct a health check before proceeding to the implement/acceptance phase.
Audit a codebase for maintenance and modernization. Challenges scope, reviews architecture/quality/tests/performance/dependencies, files deferred work via bd. Language-specific addendums for iOS/Swift, Go, and Web/JS/CSS activate automatically based on what's in the repo. Supports monorepos with mixed stacks.
Phase 1 of the feature workflow — Draft a design document for the new feature, serving as the sole input for subsequent implementation and acceptance. First gather evidence (read architecture docs, review relevant code, grep to prevent term conflicts, check archives), then write a complete first draft in one go (including YAML frontmatter + three-tier structure + test design), submit it to the user for overall review, and iterate until approval. After approval, extract {slug}-checklist.yaml from {slug}-design.md for use in the next two phases. Trigger scenarios: "Start designing the solution", "Write design doc", "Prepare to implement XX", with the prerequisite that you already know what to do, who it's for, and how to define success.
Document the finalized tech stack selections, architecture decisions, long-term constraints, and coding conventions in the project into searchable permanent records. No one will remember why X was chosen six months later, but with decision documents, at least the background can be understood before making changes next time. Four categories: tech-stack (which tools/libraries/frameworks to use), architecture (how the system is organized), constraint (what is not allowed), convention (what is uniformly done). Trigger scenarios: Proactively trigger after making important choices during feature-design or issue-analyze, or when the user says "record the decision", "archive tech selection", "ADR", "record this constraint", "write down the convention". Only archive finalized decisions; do not archive proposed solutions under discussion.
Phase 3 of the feature workflow – Complete the acceptance closed-loop. Four tasks: 1. Check layer by layer against {slug}-design.md to verify if the implementation deviates from the plan; fix any deviations on the spot instead of just "noting them" in the report. 2. Incorporate this feature into the project's overall architecture documentation. 3. If this feature changes the user story or boundaries of the corresponding requirement, update the requirement doc accordingly. 4. If this feature originated from a roadmap item, change the status of the corresponding entry in roadmap items.yaml to done and sync it with the main document. Finally, produce a {slug}-acceptance.md as the closed-loop proof for the entire workflow. Prerequisite: cs-feat-impl is completed. Trigger scenarios: User says "The feature is done, let's accept it", "Do the final check", "Prepare for merge", "Generate the acceptance report".
Draft or update requirement documents under `codestable/requirements/` for the project — use **user stories + plain language** to describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries", so non-technical readers can quickly understand the highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or during the feature-design phase, it is found that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.