Loading...
Loading...
Found 818 Skills
Execute a micro-level Flutter code quality audit. Validates code against live GitHub standards for testing, architecture, and code implementation. Produces a detailed violations report with prioritized action plan. Use when the user asks to check Flutter code quality, validate best practices, or review code standards compliance. Triggers on: 'flutter best practices', 'code quality', 'code review', 'flutter standards', 'architecture compliance', 'testing quality'.
Execute a comprehensive NestJS Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, API design, data layer, testing, code quality, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a NestJS project, run a health check, evaluate backend quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'nestjs audit', 'health audit', 'backend audit', 'nestjs health', 'node audit', 'api audit', 'project quality check'.
Analiza cambios staged en git para detectar bugs, vulnerabilidades de seguridad, malas prácticas, y genera descripciones detalladas de commits con mensaje en formato Conventional Commits. Usa este skill siempre que el usuario quiera revisar cambios antes de commitear o pushear, analizar un diff staged, detectar bugs o malas prácticas en código que está por commitear, generar un mensaje o descripción de commit, o hacer code review previo al commit. Se activa con frases como "revisá mis cambios staged", "analiza mi commit", "qué bugs tiene lo que cambié", "generame el mensaje de commit", "review antes de push", "detecta errores en mis cambios", "haceme un análisis antes de commitear", o "necesito una descripción para mi commit". NO usar para: code review de archivos sueltos sin contexto de commit, configurar linters, escribir tests, debugging de producción, o crear código nuevo. Este skill es específicamente para el momento previo al commit.
Execute a comprehensive React Project Health Audit. Analyzes tech stack, architecture, state management, testing, code quality, performance, CI/CD, and documentation. Produces a Google Docs-ready report with section scores and weighted overall score. Use when the user asks to audit a React project, run a health check, evaluate frontend quality, or assess technical debt. Triggers on: 'react audit', 'health audit', 'react health', 'frontend audit', 'next.js audit', 'vite audit', 'project quality check'.
C and C++ compiler toolchain skill covering GCC, Clang/LLVM, build modes, warnings, sanitizers, static analysis, LTO, PGO, C++20/23/26 features, and debugging. Use when writing or reviewing C/C++ code, choosing compiler flags, interpreting errors or warnings, enabling sanitizers, running clang-tidy or cppcheck, optimizing builds, working with C++20 modules or C23 features, or troubleshooting linker issues.
Guides idiomatic Lua 5.4 programming, module design, and project maintenance for Neovim plugin/config ecosystems (LazyVim, lazy.nvim) and macOS bar tools (SketchyBar/SbarLua). Covers style, tooling (StyLua, Selene, LuaLS), module patterns, and testing. Use when writing Lua code, configuring Neovim plugins, working with SketchyBar Lua configs, debugging Lua require/module errors, or when the user mentions Lua, .lua files, LazyVim, lazy.nvim, SbarLua, SketchyBar, luarocks, LuaLS, StyLua, or Selene.
Use when you need to add or evaluate Maven dependencies that improve code quality — including nullness annotations (JSpecify), static analysis (Error Prone + NullAway), functional programming (VAVR), or architecture testing (ArchUnit) — and want a consultative, question-driven approach that adds only what you actually need. Part of the skills-for-java project
This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit this codebase", "audit this code", "security audit", "code audit", "find vulnerabilities", "check for bugs", "review code quality", "find dead code", "check for anti-patterns", "performance audit", "check for code smells", "technical debt", or "code health check".
Run Gemini CLI review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.
Run Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI reviews against the current branch concurrently, deduplicate the findings, and fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase.
Run Claude Code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.
Run Codex code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.