Loading...
Loading...
Found 2,087 Skills
Full brand naming workflow for founders, agencies, and businesses. Use this skill whenever the user says "help me name this brand", "brand naming", "I need a name for", "name ideas for", "what should I call my brand/company/product", "naming a startup", "brand name suggestions", "help with naming", or shares a brand brief and asks for name options. Also triggers when the user shares existing name options and asks for feedback, evaluation, ranking, or scoring of those names. Auto-detects whether to run the full generation workflow or the evaluation workflow based on what the user provides. Always use this skill for any brand or product naming task — even if the user just casually mentions needing a name.
Build the evaluation harness that gates every fine-tuning run — golden sets, per-failure-mode graders, judge calibration, and base-model baselines. Use when starting a fine-tuning effort, when converting traces into an eval set, or when calibrating a judge against human labels.
Measures the task accuracy of text models served by MAX using standard benchmarks such as GSM8K, MMLU, HellaSwag, ARC, AIME, GPQA, TruthfulQA, WinoGrande, and BABILong. Use when benchmarking a served model, comparing it with model-card or reference scores, verifying that a new MAX model produces correct answers, or running repeatable dataset evaluations against a MAX OpenAI-compatible endpoint.
Stateful single-mission improvement loop with strict evaluator contract, markdown decision logs, and max-runtime stop behavior
INVOKE THIS SKILL when creating, running, or analyzing Arize experiments. Covers experiment CRUD, exporting runs, comparing results, and evaluation workflows using the ax CLI.
Generate and critically evaluate grounded ideas about a topic. Use when asking what to improve, requesting idea generation, exploring surprising directions, or wanting the AI to proactively suggest strong options before brainstorming one in depth. Triggers on phrases like 'what should I improve', 'give me ideas', 'ideate on X', 'surprise me', 'what would you change', or any request for AI-generated suggestions rather than refining the user's own idea.
Author and maintain MANUAL and hybrid test cases and suites in TestRail, Xray (Jira), Zephyr Scale, and Qase. Covers test-case anatomy (title, preconditions, steps, expected results, test data), suite/section organization, bulk authoring from user stories and acceptance criteria, ambiguous-step linting, CSV/API import-export payloads per tool, requirement traceability and coverage gaps, review hygiene, and when a manual case should graduate to automation. Use when: "write a test case," "manual test case," "TestRail case," "Xray test," "Zephyr Scale case," "Qase case," "import CSV into TestRail," "lint these steps," "traceability report," "should this be automated." Not for: Generating automated TEST CODE — that is ai-test-generation. Sprint-level WHAT-to-test selection — that is test-planning. Related: ai-test-generation, test-planning, exploratory-testing, qa-project-context.
Build RAG / unstructured-document evaluation datasets and demo documents (e.g. for Knowledge Assistant) on Databricks: generate synthetic PDFs locally, upload to Unity Catalog volumes, and pair each document with test questions for retrieval evaluation.
Use when perfecting a frontend design through iterative visual evaluation. Triggers: "make it look perfect", "10/10 design", "iterate on the design", "polish the UI". Loops: screenshot → evaluate → fix → re-screenshot until design scores 10/10.
Harbor CLI command reference and usage patterns. Covers harbor run, harbor jobs, harbor trials, harbor datasets, harbor adapters, harbor tasks, harbor view, harbor sweeps, harbor traces, harbor cache, and harbor admin commands. Use this skill whenever running Harbor evaluations, managing datasets, viewing results, debugging tasks, exporting traces, or working with any harbor CLI command. Also use when constructing harbor command lines, looking up flag names, or troubleshooting CLI errors.
Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.
Used for authorized OT/ICS security assessments, covering Purdue model zoning, PLC/SCADA exposure, industrial protocol discovery, and safe passive-first evaluation.