Loading...
Loading...
Found 714 Skills
Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.
Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, debugging, or refactoring TypeScript code that uses the Effect-TS library. Trigger when you see imports from `effect`, `effect/*`, or any `@effect/*` scoped package (schema, platform, sql, opentelemetry, cli, cluster, rpc, vitest). Trigger on Effect-specific constructs: Effect.gen generators, Schema.Struct/Schema.Class definitions, Layer/Context.Tag/Service patterns, Effect.pipe pipelines, Data.TaggedError/Data.Class error types, Ref/Queue/PubSub/Deferred concurrency primitives, Match module, Config providers, Scope/Exit/Cause/Runtime patterns, or any code using Effect's typed error channel (E parameter). Also trigger when the user asks about Effect patterns, migration from Promises/fp-ts/neverthrow to Effect, or how to structure an Effect application. Covers the full ecosystem: core Effect type, Schema validation, error management, concurrency (fibers, queues, semaphores, pools), streams/sinks, services and layers (DI), resource management, scheduling, observability, platform APIs, and AI integration. Do NOT trigger for React's useEffect, Redux side effects, or general English usage of "effect" unless the context clearly involves the Effect-TS library.
Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?", "why does everything depend on everything?", "are our layers correct?", "where should this code live?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Also triggers when user mentions: dependency inversion / hexagonal architecture / bounded contexts / circular imports / tangled dependencies / module coupling / package structure / spaghetti code / directory layout. Use this skill proactively when project structure, module boundaries, or architectural decisions are discussed — even without the word "audit". Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.
Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.
Identify refactoring opportunities by surfacing architectural friction. Apply the deletion test, deep-modules vocabulary, and seams analysis. Each opportunity becomes its own evanflow-writing-plans cycle. Use when reviewing code for refactoring, when a file has grown too large, or when architecture concerns surface during feature work.
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
This skill should be used when the user wants to review code, audit a diff, get a second opinion on changes, or run an adversarial review of files in the current working tree. Common triggers include "review this code", "audit this diff", "find issues in", "second opinion on this", "harsh review of", "adversarial review", and "security review of". Picks one or more reviewer personas (adversarial, security, architecture, performance). Reviews local files, `git diff`, or `git diff --staged` only — does not fetch external content. Runs in one of four modes: single-agent (one persona in the current agent), cross-model handoff (independent second opinion via another local AI CLI, with secret-shield preflight + prompt-shield wrap), multi-bg-agent (one persona per parallel background subagent), or agent-team (Claude Code Teams or equivalent on supporting agents). Skip when the user wants formatting fixes (use a linter) or refactoring patterns (use ts-best-practices or ts-best-practices-functional).
Fix a known bug in the Rock RMS codebase. Guides Claude through root cause analysis, minimal correct fix, and a release-note commit message. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "bugfix", "this is broken", "debug this", describes a bug with file paths or issue numbers, or pastes an error/stack trace with intent to fix. Also use when a bug is found by another skill (e.g. /review-conversion, /check) and the user wants it fixed. Do NOT use for: finding bugs (use /check or /review-conversion), adding features, or refactoring.
Improve existing code through safe, behavior-preserving Clean Code refactoring. Use when the user asks to refactor code, clean up messy code, improve readability, simplify structure, reduce duplication, improve naming, review maintainability, or apply Clean Code principles. Do not use for broad architecture redesign unless the user asks for redesign.
Mandatory unless the user explicitly opts out. Use when non-trivial work on features, bug fixes, refactorings, or changes to code, tests, configuration, dependencies, runtime assets, or design requires explicit planning before implementation.
Use when writing or refactoring proof-carrying code in MoonBit, especially for Why3-backed specifications, abstraction functions, representation invariants, proof assertions, recursive verified data structures, or reducing trusted proof bridges.