Loading...
Loading...
Found 978 Skills
Audit a component or page for accessibility issues and fix them
Use this skill whenever the user asks to build, create, design, redesign, polish, audit, animate, improve, fix, or "make prettier/cleaner/nicer" ANY frontend interface — landing pages, dashboards, portfolios, SaaS apps, marketing sites, components, hero sections, navbars, footers, pricing tables, posters, mobile UIs, or any web/React/Next.js/Vue/Svelte UI work. Also use when the user mentions Tailwind, shadcn, Framer Motion, 21st.dev, React Bits, animations, typography, color palettes, design taste, "make it look premium," "fix the look," or "make this less generic." Enforces production-grade design discipline (typography, color, motion, layout, accessibility, copy) and bans generic AI aesthetics like Inter font, purple-to-blue gradients, three-card feature rows, h-screen heroes, John Doe placeholder data, and "elevate/seamless/unleash" filler copy. Generates a project DESIGN.md to lock in tokens across sessions. Consolidates rules from UI/UX Pro Max, Framer Motion, 21st.dev Magic, React Bits, Anthropic frontend-design, Impeccable, and design-taste-frontend.
Run comprehensive accessibility audit (WCAG 2.1) on Webflow pages - checks buttons, forms, links, focus states, headings, keyboard navigation, and generates detailed reports with fixes. Requires Webflow Designer connection. Excludes image alt text (covered by asset-audit skill).
Reviews React Native TV apps for focus/D-pad navigation, 10-foot UI layout, TV playback/DRM integration, low-memory TV performance, and TV accessibility. Use when building, debugging, or reviewing react-native-tvos, Expo TV, Amazon Vega/Kepler, or React Native web TV targets where the issue depends on remote input, TV focus, TV packaging, TV hardware, or TV playback constraints.
Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.
Use when the user asks to "build the email HTML", "make this email responsive", "fix dark-mode rendering", or "QA the email across clients"; produces the coded HTML build — a responsive table layout, dark-mode + accessibility pass, a client-render matrix, image-block fallbacks, and a plain-text parity check. Not for writing the copy — use email-creative-builder; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件HTML/响应式邮件/暗色模式渲染
Design review grounded in Checklist Design's 100+ published checklists. Two modes — audit works through a matching checklist item by item and reports what's present, partially present or missing and whether each gap matters; critique gives quick, honest peer-style feedback on hierarchy, layout, typography, colour, accessibility, interaction and polish. Use when someone shares a UI screenshot, mockup, live URL or local build and wants a design review, feedback, an audit, a completeness check, or to know what's missing — phrasings like "does this look right," "roast my landing page," "is this accessible," "review my dashboard," "what's missing from this checkout," "does this cover everything," or "check this against the Login checklist." Covers websites, web apps, mobile apps, design system components and user flows.
Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.
Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
Final quality pass before shipping. Fixes alignment, spacing, consistency, and detail issues that separate good from great.
Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight.