Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,280 Skills
Design MCP resources to expose content for LLM consumption. Use when creating static or dynamic resources in xmcp.
PocketFlow framework for building LLM applications with graph-based abstractions, design patterns, and agentic coding workflows
USE FOR RAG/LLM grounding. Returns pre-extracted web content (text, tables, code) optimized for LLMs. GET + POST. Adjust max_tokens/count based on complexity. Supports Goggles, local/POI. For AI answers use answers. Recommended for anyone building AI/agentic applications.
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications - prevention, detection, and remediation for LLM and GenAI security. Use when building or reviewing LLM apps - prompt injection, information disclosure, training/supply chain, poisoning, output handling, excessive agency, system prompt leakage, vectors/embeddings, misinformation, unbounded consumption.
AI and ML expert including PyTorch, LangChain, LLM integration, and scientific computing
Full changelog infrastructure from scratch. Greenfield workflow. Installs semantic-release, commitlint, GitHub Actions, LLM synthesis, public page.
Expert-level AI implementation, deployment, LLM integration, and production AI systems
Help the user systematically identify and categorize failure modes in an LLM pipeline by reading traces. Use when starting a new eval project, after significant pipeline changes (new features, model switches, prompt rewrites), when production metrics drop, or after incidents.
LLM inference via paid API: OpenAI-compatible chat completions proxied through x402 providers. Supports Kimi K2.5, MiniMax M2.5. Uses x_payment tool for automatic USDC micropayments ($0.001-$0.003/call). Use when: (1) generating text with a specific model, (2) running chat completions through a pay-per-request LLM endpoint, (3) comparing outputs across models.
Use this skill when crafting, iterating, or optimizing prompts for LLMs including zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, role prompting, structured output, and prompt chaining. Not for fine-tuning or training models. Not for evaluating model quality across benchmarks.
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
Automatic LLM provider failover with fallback chains, inspired by OpenClaw/ZeroClaw model configuration.