Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,277 Skills
Expert Go backend code reviewer specializing in microservices, GORM/DAL patterns, dependency injection, and resource management. Focuses on logic correctness, goroutine leak detection, and Go-specific best practices for production-grade services.
Remove AI-style code slop from a branch by reviewing diffs, deleting inconsistent defensive noise, and preserving behavior and local style.
在當前會話中執行具有獨立任務的實施計劃時使用
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Style, review, and refactoring standards for Python codebases with strong typing, explicit error handling, and maintainable module boundaries. Use when Python artifacts are created, changed, or reviewed and Python-specific quality rules must be enforced.
Use this skill when orchestrating multiple review types. Use when general review needed without knowing which specific skill applies, full multi-domain review desired, integrated reporting needed. Do not use when specific review type known - use bug-review, test-review, etc. DO NOT use when: architecture-only focus - use architecture-review.
Execute CodeRabbit secondary workflow: Core Workflow B. Use when implementing secondary use case, or complementing primary workflow. Trigger with phrases like "coderabbit secondary workflow", "secondary task with coderabbit".
Use when reviewing embedded or firmware code changes, especially in C/C++, bare-metal, RTOS, driver, ISR, DMA, boot, NFC, or other hardware-facing paths where cross-review by independent agents can catch correctness and safety issues
Apply DX-first heuristics to implementations, refactors, reviews, and debugging. Use when the user asks for code review, refactoring guidance, API design feedback, maintainability/readability improvements, or “make this easier to debug/onboard”.
Split a large PR diff into reviewable sub-patches for easier code review.
Turn plans, specs, diffs, and half-confident opinions into something that can survive contact with a real review.
Review the latest changes and check whether they comply with the project's documented guidelines (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or equivalent). Use when reviewing local diffs, recent commits, or feature work and you need a findings-first assessment of architecture, reuse, testing, and repo-specific rules.