Loading...
Loading...
Found 753 Skills
Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality
Have Codex CLI review uncommitted code changes. Claude Code then fixes valid issues and rebuts invalid ones. Codex re-reviews. Repeat until consensus. Codex never touches code — it only reviews.
Remove AI-style code slop from a branch by reviewing diffs, deleting inconsistent defensive noise, and preserving behavior and local style.
Apply the Tell Don't Ask (TDA) principle when reviewing, writing, or refactoring object-oriented code. Use this skill whenever the user asks about OOP design, mentions getters/setters, wants to review a class for encapsulation issues, asks how to move logic closer to data, or asks why code feels "procedural" despite using classes. Also trigger when the user asks to refactor code that queries an object's state before making decisions externally. This skill should kick in for any code review or design question involving data access patterns, encapsulation, or how objects should collaborate.
Use when opening a pull request, submitting code for review, or when the user says "create PR," "open PR," or "/gh-pr-create." Generates conventional-commit title and structured body from branch commits.
[Review & Quality] Review all uncommitted changes before commit
Generate production-ready Greptile AI code review configuration for any repository. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Greptile, AI code review setup, PR review configuration, automated code review rules, or wants to set up .greptile/ config files. Also trigger when someone says "set up code review", "configure PR reviews", "add review rules", or asks about Greptile configuration — even if they don't say "Greptile" explicitly but describe wanting AI-powered PR review automation. This skill analyzes the actual repository structure and produces tailored config, not generic boilerplate.
Reviews staged git changes for code quality, maintainability, readability, and potential regressions. Verifies changes make sense in context, improve maintainability, enhance readability, and don't introduce side effects. Use when reviewing staged changes, examining git diffs, or when the user asks to review modifications before committing.
Anti-patterns for CLI development. Do NOT use commander, inquirer.js, yargs, or other CLI libraries in Constructive projects. Use inquirerer instead. Triggers on "commander", "inquirer.js", "yargs", "CLI library", or when reviewing CLI code.
Полный цикл разработки доработок 1С — от анализа до реализации с БСП compliance. 9 фаз: оценка, discovery, исследование, уточнение, проектирование, ревью плана, реализация, ревью кода, итоги.
Reviews error handling strategy and exception design. Use when the user asks to review error handling, when a module throws too many exceptions, or when callers must handle errors they shouldn't need to know about. Applies the "define errors out of existence" principle with a decision tree for exception strategies.
Diagnoses what makes code complex and why, using the three-symptom two-root-cause framework. Use when code feels harder to work with than it should but the specific problem is unclear. This skill identifies WHETHER complexity exists and WHERE it comes from. Not for scanning a checklist of known design smells (use red-flags) or evaluating a specific module's depth (use deep-modules).