Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,023 Skills
Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.
Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?", "why does everything depend on everything?", "are our layers correct?", "where should this code live?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Also triggers when user mentions: dependency inversion / hexagonal architecture / bounded contexts / circular imports / tangled dependencies / module coupling / package structure / spaghetti code / directory layout. Use this skill proactively when project structure, module boundaries, or architectural decisions are discussed — even without the word "audit". Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.
This skill should be used when the user wants to review code, audit a diff, get a second opinion on changes, or run an adversarial review of files in the current working tree. Common triggers include "review this code", "audit this diff", "find issues in", "second opinion on this", "harsh review of", "adversarial review", and "security review of". Picks one or more reviewer personas (adversarial, security, architecture, performance). Reviews local files, `git diff`, or `git diff --staged` only — does not fetch external content. Runs in one of four modes: single-agent (one persona in the current agent), cross-model handoff (independent second opinion via another local AI CLI, with secret-shield preflight + prompt-shield wrap), multi-bg-agent (one persona per parallel background subagent), or agent-team (Claude Code Teams or equivalent on supporting agents). Skip when the user wants formatting fixes (use a linter) or refactoring patterns (use ts-best-practices or ts-best-practices-functional).
Fix a known bug in the Rock RMS codebase. Guides Claude through root cause analysis, minimal correct fix, and a release-note commit message. Use when the user says "fix this bug", "bugfix", "this is broken", "debug this", describes a bug with file paths or issue numbers, or pastes an error/stack trace with intent to fix. Also use when a bug is found by another skill (e.g. /review-conversion, /check) and the user wants it fixed. Do NOT use for: finding bugs (use /check or /review-conversion), adding features, or refactoring.
Use when writing or refactoring proof-carrying code in MoonBit, especially for Why3-backed specifications, abstraction functions, representation invariants, proof assertions, recursive verified data structures, or reducing trusted proof bridges.
For the creation, review, refactoring, and presentation of .ipynb Notebooks (Jupyter / JupyterLab / Google Colab / VS Code). Covers engineered directory structures, efficient token processing, demonstration/sharing patterns, and reproducible workflows with uv/venv.
Use when building, refactoring, debugging, or testing iOS/macOS features using The Composable Architecture (TCA). Covers feature structure, effects, dependencies, navigation patterns, and testing with TestStore.
Use when completing implementation, fixing bugs, refactoring code, or any time you need to verify the test suite passes. Also use when tests fail and you hear "pre-existing" or "not my changes" — enforces strict code ownership.
Senior Terraform and Infrastructure as Code engineer. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Terraform configurations. Enforces modular design and production patterns.
CMake build system skill for C/C++ projects. Use when writing or refactoring CMakeLists.txt, configuring out-of-source builds, selecting generators (Ninja, Make, VS), managing targets and dependencies with target_link_libraries, integrating external packages via find_package or FetchContent, enabling sanitizers, setting up toolchain files for cross-compilation, or exporting CMake packages. Activates on queries about CMakeLists.txt, cmake configure errors, target properties, install rules, CPack, or CMake presets.
Comprehensive guide for Riverpod v3 development in Flutter, focusing on code generation, modular architecture, and modern state management patterns. Use this skill when: (1) Creating new providers or notifiers, (2) Refactoring existing state management code, (3) Setting up testing for Riverpod, or (4) Structuring new features using Riverpod.
Applies QML best practices when producing or working with QML source code. Use whenever QML code is the primary subject: writing, reviewing, fixing, refactoring, optimizing, or debugging QML files, components, or bindings. Do NOT trigger for purely conversational QML questions where no code is produced or examined (e.g. "explain how anchors work").