Loading...
Loading...
Found 83 Skills
LaTeX Assistant for Chinese Academic Theses (PhD/Master's). Fields: Deep Learning, Time Series, Industrial Control. Trigger Words (call any module independently): - "compile", "compile", "xelatex" → Compilation Module - "structure", "structure", "map" → Structure Mapping Module - "format", "format", "GB/T", "national standard" → National Standard Format Checking Module - "expression", "expression", "polish", "academic expression" → Academic Expression Module - "logic", "coherence", "logic", "cohesion", "methodology", "methodology" → Logical Cohesion & Methodology Depth Module - "long sentence", "long sentence", "split" → Long & Complex Sentence Analysis Module - "bib", "bibliography", "bibliography" → Bibliography Module - "template", "template", "thuthesis", "pkuthss" → Template Detection Module - "deai", "de-AI editing", "humanize", "reduce AI traces" → De-AI Editing Module - "title", "title", "title optimization", "generate title" → Title Optimization Module
AI-enhanced LaTeX Example Intelligent Generator, achieving organic integration of AI and hard-coding. AI handles "semantic understanding" (analyzing chapter themes, inferring resource relevance, generating coherent narratives), while hard-coding is responsible for "structure protection" (format validation, hash verification, access control). It applies to scenarios where users request "filling example content/generating examples/supplementing LaTeX examples".
Raise frontend visual judgment for web interfaces with a bias toward refined product-grade composition, precise component craftsmanship, disciplined interaction states, controlled motion, and coherent depth systems. Use when generating, reviewing, or refactoring web UI that feels generic, cluttered, flat, over-styled, theatrically animated, visually imprecise, or AI-generated.
Use when facing decisions with multiple legitimate perspectives and inherent tensions. Invoke when stakeholders have competing priorities (growth vs. sustainability, speed vs. quality, innovation vs. risk), need to pressure-test ideas from different angles before committing, exploring tradeoffs between incompatible values, synthesizing conflicting expert opinions into coherent strategy, or surfacing assumptions that single-viewpoint analysis would miss.
Map user missions from trigger to value moment, organizing features into coherent paths during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to map user journeys, define user flows, describe how users accomplish goals, or when user asks "map user journeys", "define user flows", "user missions", "how do users accomplish X?", "journey mapping", "what steps do users take?", "pain to value flow". Consumes PER- (Persona Definition), FEA- (Feature Value Planning), KPI- (Outcome Definition). Outputs UJ- entries with step flows, pain points, and value moments. Feeds v0.4 Screen Flow Definition.
Set up or repair codecontext adoption in a project. Use this whenever the user wants to add @context annotations to a repo, install the codecontext toolchain, update AGENTS.md guidance, improve agent workflows around decision capture, or audit whether an existing codecontext setup is coherent. Prefer this skill over vague "document the tool" work: it is specifically for making a repo actually usable with codecontext.
Orchestrates end-to-end interview preparation for senior ML/AI engineers targeting Anthropic and peer companies. Use for prep timeline generation, story coherence across rounds, mock scheduling, and debrief analysis. Activate on "interview prep", "interview loop", "Anthropic interview", "prep timeline". NOT for resume writing, career narratives, or individual round-type practice.
Use when authoring or normalising a specialist skill, or preparing to ship a feature or release — defines the seven evidence categories every specialist skill must declare against and provides the canonical Release Evidence Bundle template. The contract spine that turns scattered validation skills into a coherent ship-readiness check.
Write multi-chapter books (technical, tutorial, monograph, etc.) end-to-end. Handles outline planning, per-chapter drafting that stays coherent across long manuscripts, chapter review, and final HTML/PDF build. Trigger when user mentions "写书", "写一本书", "出书", "技术书", "book writing", "逐章写作", "O'Reilly", "mdbook", or wants to author a multi-chapter book.
Build a compilable type-level skeleton from a high-level architecture spec before writing any implementation logic. Use when you have an architectural assessment, design doc, or restructuring plan and need to prove the new architecture is sound before migrating code. Also use when asked to "scaffold the new architecture", "create type stubs", "build the shell", "flesh out this spec", "skeleton the modules", or any request to turn architectural intent into verified structure. This skill follows the "Human Builds the Shell" paradigm: types are hard constraints that the compiler enforces, so if the skeleton compiles, the architecture is structurally sound. Especially valuable for large refactors where you don't trust agents to maintain coherence.
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.