Loading...
Loading...
Found 210 Skills
Sync local changes to GitHub in one command: detect state, branch, commit, push, create PR. Use when user wants to push work to GitHub, create a PR, or sync a feature branch. Use for "push my changes", "create a PR", "sync to GitHub", "open pull request", or "ship this". Do NOT use for reviewing PRs (use /pr-review), cleaning up after merge (use pr-cleanup), or CI checks (use ci).
Generates structured test assertions and failure diagnostics for skill packages from a definition and task prompt. Triggers on: "verify this skill", "generate assertions", "surrogate verification", "diagnose skill failure". NOT for code review, use pr-review.
Use when babysitting a PR/MR until CI is green and every valid reviewer feedback is addressed — supports GitHub PR (gh) and GitLab MR (glab), triages comments into Valid / Discuss / Out-of-scope, addresses valid items with small commits and inline thread replies, escalates invisible findings (SonarQube/Snyk dashboards) and 3-round bot deadlocks, reports ready-to-merge (never auto-merges). Triggers — '監看 PR', 'babysit PR/MR', 'PR 顧到 merge', 'address review feedback', 'wait until CI green', '把 PR 顧到綠'. NOT for writing PR descriptions, NOT for diff code review (use pr-review), NOT for actually merging the PR (user does that).
Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in spec_context.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json. Use during PR review when approved or repository spec context is available.
Validate that a branch or pull request implementation matches introduced product, technical, security, and related specs. Use when reviewing or finishing a spec-driven change and resolving mismatches between checked-in specs and implementation.
Resolves unresolved GitHub PR review threads end-to-end: evaluates whether each review comment is correct, applies a targeted fix when valid, replies with rationale when not, commits, and resolves the thread. USE FOR: unresolved review threads, PR review feedback, changes requested PRs, PR review URLs (#pullrequestreview-...), fix the review comments, close the open threads, address PR feedback. DO NOT USE FOR: summarizing feedback without code changes, creating new PRs, or read-only branches.
Walk users through PR review comments, fetching and displaying them first when needed, collect per-comment response decisions, apply requested fixes, and preview GitHub replies and resolutions before posting. Use when responding to PR review comments on the current branch.
Review a code change (diff or PR) for ship-readiness before merge. Use when reviewing your own or someone else's changes prior to committing/merging/etc.
fix PR review feedback: fetch unresolved threads, triage each finding skeptically, fix what holds, reply on threads, commit and push. Triggers: /fix-pr, address PR reviews. Reached by prath-mode after make-pr. Flags: --pr <n|url>, --no-push, --no-reply.
Review dependency PRs with structured research, existing-PR-discussion capture, multi-lens analysis (security, code quality, impact), and a repeatable verdict template. USE FOR: dependency update PRs, Renovate/Dependabot PRs, library upgrade reviews, "review this dependency PR", "should we merge this update". DO NOT USE FOR: feature PRs, application code reviews, dependency automation/bot configuration, or unattended merge without confirmation.