Loading...
Loading...
Found 145 Skills
Meta-prompting framework for critiquing responses, analyzing solution trajectories, and evaluating AI-generated content quality
Use when the user wants to review a pull request, understand what a PR changes, assess risk of merging, or check for missing test coverage. Examples: "Review this PR", "What does PR #42 change?", "Is this PR safe to merge?"
Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Automated validation with regex patterns, thresholds, and reporting.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate a plugin", "optimize plugin", "check plugin quality", "review plugin structure", or mentions plugin optimization and validation tasks.
Review code for performance: complexity, database/query efficiency, I/O and network cost, memory and allocation behavior, concurrency contention, caching, and latency/throughput regressions. Cognitive-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.
Evaluate skill quality against best practices. Use when asked to "rate this skill", "review skill quality", "check skill formatting", "is this skill good", "evaluate SKILL.md", "grade this skill", or when validating skill files before publishing.
This skill should be used when analyzing technical debt in a codebase, documenting code quality issues, creating technical debt registers, or assessing code maintainability. Use this for identifying code smells, architectural issues, dependency problems, missing documentation, security vulnerabilities, and creating comprehensive technical debt documentation.
Run a comprehensive data quality assessment and produce a scorecard across 6 dimensions: completeness, uniqueness, consistency, timeliness, accuracy, validity. Use when the user asks about data quality, mentions data issues, wants to audit a table, is onboarding a new data source, or needs to validate pipeline output.
Evaluate test suite quality by introducing code mutations and verifying tests catch them. Use for mutation testing, test quality, mutant detection, Stryker, PITest, and test effectiveness analysis.
[Trigger] When PPT workflow needs SVG slide quality review via Gemini. [Output] Structured review assessment with scores, pass/fail, and fix suggestions. [Skip] For content authoring or SVG generation tasks (those are handled by Claude). [Ask] No user input needed; invoked by review-core agent. [Resource Usage] Use references/, scripts/ (`scripts/invoke-gemini-ppt.ts`).
Review the code quality of a spec-driven change. Checks readability, security, performance, and best practices before archiving.
Retrieves protein structure data from RCSB PDB, PDBe, and AlphaFold with protein disambiguation, quality assessment, and comprehensive structural profiles. Creates detailed structure reports with experimental metadata, ligand information, and download links. Use when users need protein structures, 3D models, crystallography data, or mention PDB IDs (4-character codes like 1ABC) or UniProt accessions.