Loading...
Loading...
Found 70 Skills
Static source-code vulnerability scan. Reads a target directory (and THREAT_MODEL.md if present), spawns parallel review subagents per focus area, and writes VULN-FINDINGS.json + .md for /triage to consume. Read-only — no building, running, or network. For execution-verified crashes, use vuln-pipeline instead. Use when asked to "scan for vulns", "review this code for security issues", "find bugs in <dir>", or as the step between /threat-model and /triage.
Analyze repository and suggest improvements
Read a GitHub Issue, create a detailed plan in `_/local-plans/<issue-number>-<slug>.md`, and implement the code **after user approval**. After implementation, perform a security review (OWASP Top 10) → run tests → commit using Conventional Commits. Used for implementation requests where an Issue number or URL is provided, such as "Implement Issue #N" or "Start working on this Issue".
Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.
Reviews a change by running the mission, architecture, implementation, craft, security, and performance passes, then weighing them into a verdict.
Review code for security: injection, sensitive data, authentication and authorization, dependencies and CVEs, configuration and secrets, and crypto. Cognitive-only atomic skill; output is a findings list.
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or standardizing review practices.
Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or libraries — particularly those with `unsafe`, FFI, or concurrent code.
Acts as the persistent supervisor, launching and monitoring the automated review campaign. Use when running a long-running, continuous security review campaign that needs autonomous coordination. Don't use for executing individual review stages directly.