Loading...
Loading...
Found 371 Skills
Use when asked to detect silent failures/weak error handling or explicitly asked to run the silent-failure-hunter subagent.
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
Interactive brainstorming with parallel subagent collaboration, idea expansion, and documented thought evolution. Parallel multi-perspective analysis for Codex.
Create work-order with minimal context for isolated subagent execution, optionally linked to GitHub issue
Delegate noisy investigation to one or more subagents so the orchestrator's context stays clean, then work from the distilled answer. Use this skill whenever answering a question would require reading many files, long logs, large diffs, or wide codebase surveys — i.e. when producing the answer generates far more noise than the answer itself. Use it for "how does X work", "where is Y used", "what's the root cause of Z", "summarize this PR/log" style questions, and reach for it liberally before reading a pile of files inline.
Automated multi-agent orchestrator that spawns CLI subagents in parallel, coordinates via MCP Memory, and monitors progress
Technical debt detection and remediation. Run at session end to find duplicated code, dead imports, security issues, and complexity hotspots. Triggers: 'find tech debt', 'scan for issues', 'check code quality', 'wrap up session', 'ready to commit', 'before merge', 'code review prep'. Always uses parallel subagents for fast analysis.
Maps and documents codebases of any size by orchestrating parallel subagents. Creates docs/CODEBASE_MAP.md with architecture, file purposes, dependencies, and navigation guides. Updates CLAUDE.md with a summary. Use when user says "map this codebase", "cartographer", "/cartographer", "create codebase map", "document the architecture", "understand this codebase", or when onboarding to a new project. Automatically detects if map exists and updates only changed sections.
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
CRITICAL skill for executing multiple runSubagent calls in a SINGLE function_calls block for true parallelism. Essential for efficient multi-task workflows, subagent coordination, and maximizing throughput.
When multiple tests fail, assign each failing test file to a separate subagent that fixes it independently in parallel.
Research-driven code review and validation at multiple levels of abstraction. Two modes: (1) Session review — after making changes, review and verify work using parallel reviewers that research-validate every assumption; (2) Full codebase audit — deep end-to-end evaluation using parallel teams of subagent-spawning reviewers. Use when reviewing changes, verifying work quality, auditing a codebase, validating correctness, checking assumptions, finding defects, reducing complexity. NOT for writing new code, explaining code, or benchmarking.