Loading...
Loading...
Found 813 Skills
Autonomous site migration from any legacy stack to modern Next.js. Visual diffing, best practices enforcement, live progress on localhost.
Systematic approach to implementing new features in the Rust memory system following project conventions. Use when adding new functionality with proper testing and documentation, maintaining code quality and test coverage.
Naming patterns and conventions based on Clean Code JavaScript principles.
Comprehensive multi-stage code review using specialized subagents. Use when reviewing PRs with complex architectural impact, security concerns, or when thorough multi-perspective analysis is needed.
Executes comprehensive PR reviews following Freenet standards. Performs four-perspective review covering code-first analysis, testing, skeptical review, and big-picture assessment.
Code Reviewer Specialist. Use this to review PRs, check security, and ensure code quality standards before merging.
Reduce cyclomatic complexity with targeted refactoring strategies
Three-lens code review using parallel subagents: Epimetheus (hindsight — bugs, debt, fragility), Metis (craft — clarity, idiom, fit-for-purpose), Prometheus (foresight — vision, extensibility, future-Claude). Triggers on /titans, /review, 'review this code', 'what did I miss', 'before I ship this'. Use after completing substantial work, before /close. (user)
AI-powered systematic codebase analysis. Combines mechanical structure extraction with Claude's semantic understanding to produce documentation that captures not just WHAT code does, but WHY it exists and HOW it fits into the system. Includes pattern recognition, red flag detection, flow tracing, and quality assessment. Use for codebase analysis, documentation generation, architecture understanding, or code review.
Pre-commit code quality review workflow. Use before committing changes to verify code quality, security, testing coverage, and adherence to project conventions. Supports both automated checking and interactive review modes.
Comprehensively reviews Python libraries for quality across project structure, packaging, code quality, testing, security, documentation, API design, and CI/CD. Provides actionable feedback and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating library health, preparing for major releases, or auditing dependencies.
Core code quality principles for writing maintainable code. Use when reviewing code for design violations, assessing code quality, or applying architectural patterns like composition, immutability, and fail-fast.