Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,266 Skills
This skill should be used when reviewing pull requests, performing comprehensive code review, analyzing code changes before merge, or when the user asks for thorough/ultra-critical code review. Performs EXTREMELY CRITICAL 6-pass analysis identifying runtime failures, code consistency issues, architectural problems, environment compatibility risks, and verification strategies. Posts structured review as GitHub PR comment. Use when user asks to "review PR", "review this code", "review changes", "check this PR", "analyze PR", "post review", or for Phase 3 of devflow. Supports parallel review mode with multiplier (code-review-3, code-review 6X) for consensus-based reviews. This is an ultra-critical reviewer that does not let things slip and desires only perfection.
Run candid-review in a loop until all issues are resolved, with configurable auto, review-each, or interactive modes and support for ignored issues
Open source contribution best practices. Creating quality pull requests, writing good issues, following project conventions, and collaborating effectively with maintainers.
Systematic code refactoring skill that transforms complex, hard-to-understand code into clear, well-documented, maintainable code while preserving correctness. Use when users request "readable", "maintainable", or "clean" code, during code reviews flagging comprehension issues, for legacy code modernization, or in educational/onboarding contexts. Applies structured refactoring patterns with validation.
GitHub workflow for ToolUniverse - push code safely by moving temp files, activating pre-commit hooks, running tests, and cleaning staged files. Use when pushing to GitHub, fixing CI failures, or cleaning up before commits.
Use OpenAI's Codex CLI as an independent code reviewer to provide second opinions on code implementations, architectural decisions, code specifications, and pull requests. Trigger when users request code review, second opinion, independent review, architecture validation, or mention Codex review. Provides unbiased analysis using GPT-5-Codex model through the codex exec command for non-interactive reviews.
Write Rust tests to verify correctness of Rust code.
Coordinates code quality checks: ln-511 code quality, ln-512 tech debt cleanup, ln-513 agent review, ln-514 regression. Sequential pipeline, returns results to ln-500.
Use this agent for audits, debugging nasty bugs, deep research, getting second opinions on approaches, reviewing commits for correctness, or analyzing complex problems. Invoke when you need advanced reasoning about difficult issues. Use PROACTIVELY when encountering complex bugs, architectural decisions, or when a thorough review would prevent future issues.
Removes AI-generated code slop from git diffs to maintain code quality
Load PROACTIVELY when task involves reviewing code, auditing quality, or validating implementations. Use when user says "review this code", "check this PR", "audit the codebase", or "score this implementation". Covers the 10-dimension weighted scoring rubric (correctness, security, performance, architecture, testing, error handling, type safety, maintainability, accessibility, documentation), automated pattern detection for anti-patterns, and structured review output with actionable findings.
Principios para escribir codigo de calidad. Usa cuando el usuario diga "buenas practicas", "best practices", "coding guidelines", "code quality", "clean code", "principios de codigo", "refactorizar con principios", "refactor with principles", o quiera seguir patrones de calidad.