Loading...
Loading...
Found 870 Skills
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
ELI5-style explanations with analogies and multiple examples. Explains concepts at different levels (ELI5, high school, undergraduate, graduate). Uses real-world analogies and visual metaphors. Use when explaining difficult concepts, clarifying confusing topics, or learning new subjects. Triggers - explain concept, ELI5, explain like I'm 5, what is, how does, why does, analogy for, simple explanation.
Use when the user asks "what predefined metrics are available", "which built-in metrics should I use", "what does CSAT measure", "how does hallucination detection work", "what's the difference between Interruption Score and AI Interrupting User", "which metrics are free", "which metrics need audio", "configure silence threshold", "set up sentiment metric", or any question about Cekura's out-of-the-box metrics. Covers the full catalog of predefined metrics — what each does, costs, constraints, configuration options, and when to use each one.
Fetch raw OHLCV price data using the aipa CLI. Use this skill whenever the user asks for price data, candle data, OHLCV data, historical prices, stock quotes, crypto prices, moving averages, volume data, or any raw market data without AI analysis. Also use for: top performers, worst performers, best stocks, top gainers, biggest losers, market movers, ranking tickers by price change / volume / value / MA scores / money flow (`aipa performers`); volume profile, POC, point of control, value area, support/resistance by volume, volume-by-price histogram (`aipa volume-profile`). Also use for fundamental data: company info, financial ratios, PE, PB, ROE, NPL, CAR, fundamental ranking and screening (`aipa fundamentals info/ratios/rank/screen`). Also use when the user wants to inspect what data is available, build charts, perform their own calculations, or get numbers for a spreadsheet. Even if the user doesn't mention "aipa", trigger this skill for any raw financial data, fundamental data, or market ranking request.
Generate a pull request subject line and a concise description by analyzing the commits and diff on the current local git branch. Use this whenever the user is preparing a PR and wants help writing its title or body — phrases like "write a PR description", "summarize my changes for a PR", "what should the PR title be", "draft the PR for this branch", or "describe these commits". Trigger even if the user doesn't say the exact words "pull request" but is clearly wrapping up branch work and wants it summarized for review. This skill only reads git locally and prints the result for the user to copy — it never pushes or edits anything on GitHub.
Owns the smoke test contract for an ML experiment: a small, diagnostic-by-construction pytest that fits the experiment's learner on a portion of the real `data/` source and predicts on a *disjoint* portion that deliberately carries **no pre-history buffer**. The assertion is structural — the number of predictions must equal the number of rows in the predict grid. A pipeline that loads-then-features-then-splits will silently drop the cold-start rows of the predict slice and the test will fail with a row-count mismatch; a pipeline that marks X early and references upstream history nodes from feature steps will pass trivially. The smoke test is the executable proof of the X-marker placement rule from `build-ml-pipeline`. TRIGGER when: `test-ml-pipeline` has dispatched here to write the smoke test for an approved experiment; `pytest tests/smoke/` is failing on row count; the user asks "why is the smoke test failing?"; a pipeline edit in `build-ml-pipeline` needs an executable proof; an experiment script changes the pipeline shape and the matching smoke test needs revisiting. SKIP when: the design note does not exist or is not yet approved (route to `iterate-ml-experiment`); the user is asking about a regression test or schema invariant (route to `regression-test-ml-pipeline` / `distribution-test-ml-pipeline` once those exist); the question is the *interpretation* of CV metrics, not predict-time correctness (route to `evaluate-ml-pipeline`). HOW TO USE: read the matching experiment's `journal/NN_*.md` and `experiments/NN_*.py` first to understand the pipeline's source binding (what env-dict keys does `build_learner` expect?). Then construct two env-dicts from the **real `data/` source** — a train env and a predict env — such that the predict env carries *only the rows we want predictions for* and *no pre-history buffer*. The hard assertion is that the prediction count matches the predict-env row count exactly. The soft assertion is that the smoke set's MAE is within `3 × CV_mean` (or the task-appropriate analogue). **Do not write the design note or run CV — that's other skills' job.**
Interactive prompt studio for HappyHorse 1.0 video generation. Guides users through scenario discovery with vivid examples, then assembles production-ready prompts in JP/CN/EN. Use when someone wants to create AI video content with HappyHorse but doesn't know where to start, or when they have a specific scenario and need a polished prompt. Covers manga drama, character PV, manga motion, virtual idol MV, and free-form scenarios.
Show real token usage and estimated savings for the current session. Reads directly from the Claude Code session log — no AI estimation. Triggers on /hui-stats. Output is injected by the mode-tracker hook; the model itself does not compute the numbers.
Runs and interprets AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments. Covers starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings. Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings, or understand failure modes, or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it. Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments.
Adds user authentication to web and mobile apps with Amazon Cognito (user pools and identity pools) and the AWS Amplify client auth libraries. Covers sign-up/sign-in flows and the login page (Cognito-hosted UI / managed login), MFA, password policies, OAuth 2.0 / OIDC flows (auth-code + PKCE, client credentials), social/SAML federation, tokens (ID/access/refresh, rotation, revocation, storage), Cognito Lambda triggers, identity pools (temp AWS creds), and gating API Gateway (or ALB) routes to signed-in users via Cognito/JWT authorizers. Applies when adding a login or sign-up page, configuring a user pool or app client, choosing user pool vs identity pool, wiring social/SAML, refreshing tokens, requiring sign-in on an API Gateway or ALB, or debugging redirect_uri/token/MFA/CORS/federation errors. Does NOT cover Amplify Gen2 backend definitions (defineAuth, npx ampx → aws-amplify), IAM/STS/Identity Center (→ aws-iam), or API Gateway/Lambda resource config beyond the authorizer (→ aws-serverless).
Before declaring any task complete, actually verify the outcome. Run the code. Test the fix. Check the output. Claude's training optimizes for plausible-looking output, not verified-correct output. This skill forces the verification step that doesn't come naturally. No victory laps without proof.
Fast, targeted single-pass search strategy for simple factual lookups. 1-iteration workflow with authoritative source verification and minimal citations. Use for version lookups, documentation finding, simple definitions, existence checks. Keywords: what version, find docs, link to, what is, does X support.