Loading...
Loading...
Found 906 Skills
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for Kerberos delegation, SPN trust edges, S4U abuse, RBCD, constrained or unconstrained delegation, and service-ticket acceptance. Use when the user asks about constrained delegation, unconstrained delegation, RBCD, S4U, SPNs, ticket acceptance, or how a Kerberos trust edge turns into effective privilege under sandbox assumptions. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
Your startup isn't just your team - it's an ecosystem of people who have a stake in your success. Investors, board members, advisors, partners, vendors. Each group has different needs, different communication rhythms, and different expectations. Get it wrong, and you lose credibility. Get it right, and you have an army of advocates multiplying your reach. This skill covers investor updates, board communications, partner management, advisor engagement, and vendor relationships. It's about building trust through consistent, thoughtful communication that treats stakeholders as partners in your mission, not just audiences to manage. Use when "stakeholder, investor update, board meeting, board deck, advisor, partner, vendor, monthly update, quarterly update, keep stakeholders informed, investor relations, stakeholder, investor, board, advisor, partner, vendor, updates, communications, relationship, engagement" mentioned.
Evaluate backlink quality using Domain Authority, Domain Rating, and trust metrics. Use this skill when the user needs to assess link profile health, identify toxic backlinks, or plan link building strategy — even if they say 'check my backlinks', 'link building', or 'domain authority analysis'.
Building decay and upkeep systems for survival games. Use when implementing timer-based decay, Tool Cupboard patterns (Rust-style protection radius), resource upkeep costs, or server performance management through automatic cleanup. Balances gameplay and server health.
Richard Feynman's Integrity Audit applied to any analysis, business plan, or decision. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Source Auditor, Self-Deception Hunter, Translation Tester, Cargo Cult Inspector, Confidence Inverter — who each apply a distinct lens from Feynman's framework to detect dishonesty, self-deception, and cargo cult reasoning. The lead synthesizes into a verdict: is this analysis honest, or is it fooling itself? Use when the user says "feynman this", "integrity audit", "is this honest", "am I fooling myself", "cargo cult check", or wants to stress-test any analysis, plan, or claim before trusting it. Works standalone or as a meta-audit after /munger or /thiel.
Build a compilable type-level skeleton from a high-level architecture spec before writing any implementation logic. Use when you have an architectural assessment, design doc, or restructuring plan and need to prove the new architecture is sound before migrating code. Also use when asked to "scaffold the new architecture", "create type stubs", "build the shell", "flesh out this spec", "skeleton the modules", or any request to turn architectural intent into verified structure. This skill follows the "Human Builds the Shell" paradigm: types are hard constraints that the compiler enforces, so if the skeleton compiles, the architecture is structurally sound. Especially valuable for large refactors where you don't trust agents to maintain coherence.
Best practices and rules for securing FiveM resources against cheaters and exploits. Use this skill when writing or reviewing server-side and client-side code to ensure malicious events, unauthorized entity creations, and client trust issues are prevented. Focuses on strict server authority and safe event handling.
Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", or any electronics/PCB design question.
Collect and submit developer feedback to the LiveAvatar team. Use when: (1) A LiveAvatar integration is done, working, finished, or complete, (2) The user says "it works", "we're done", "that's it", "ship it", (3) The user is frustrated, stuck, or giving up — "this is broken", "this doesn't work", "I'm stuck", "I give up", "this is frustrating", "I want to report an issue", (4) The user explicitly asks to give feedback, report a bug, file an issue, or share a suggestion about LiveAvatar, (5) You've seen 3+ failed attempts at the same integration step, (6) You just finished writing or generating LiveAvatar integration code for the user.
Use when writing or refactoring proof-carrying code in MoonBit, especially for Why3-backed specifications, abstraction functions, representation invariants, proof assertions, recursive verified data structures, or reducing trusted proof bridges.
Official Glue IDL guide for agents. Use when writing, explaining, validating, configuring, or generating code from Glue files into TypeScript, Python, Rust, Go, OpenAPI, JSON Schema, or Protobuf.
Analyze a Salesforce project against the Salesforce Well-Architected framework (Trusted / Easy / Adaptable). Use when the developer asks to "review the architecture", "run a Well-Architected check", "audit this project", "is this project well-architected?", "assess security/governor-limit/packageability risk across the project", or wants a holistic code-and-metadata health report. Grades the criteria that are observable from code and metadata (sharing/FLS, bulkification, selective SOQL, trigger-handler separation, legacy tech, packageability) with file:line evidence, and emits a human checklist for governance/process pillars it cannot see (security matrix, BCP, roadmaps, AI governance). Distinct from `dx-code-analyzer-run` (single-tool Code Analyzer scan of Apex) — this skill is a multi-pillar architectural review that orchestrates several analysis skills and maps findings to Well-Architected. Read-only: it grades and advises, never edits.