Loading...
Loading...
Found 987 Skills
Comprehensive code review checklist for Go projects. Evaluates code quality, idiomatic patterns, error handling, naming, package structure, and test coverage. Use when reviewing Go code, PRs, or before merging changes. Trigger examples: "review this code", "check this PR", "code review", "review Go file". Do NOT use for security-specific audits (use go-security-audit) or performance-specific analysis (use go-performance-review).
Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
Run Claude Code review against the current branch and report only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, without applying fixes.
Run Codex code review against the current branch, fix only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, and leave invalid comments unchanged.
Comprehensive Rust coding guidelines covering ownership, error handling, async patterns, traits, testing, performance, clippy, and documentation. Use when writing new Rust code, reviewing or refactoring existing Rust, implementing async systems with Tokio, designing error hierarchies, choosing between borrowing and cloning, setting up tests or benchmarks, configuring linting, or optimizing performance. Do not use for non-Rust languages or general software architecture unrelated to Rust idioms.
Iterative code refinement through plan → code → evaluate → refine cycles. Runs lint checks (ruff), tests (pytest), and structured self-evaluation each cycle, then diagnoses failures and refines. Decomposes complex tasks into sequential phases, iterates up to 3 times per phase (10 total). Use when: the main agent delegates a code task with 'MODE: MORE_EFFORT', the user selects 'More Effort' code generation mode, or the task explicitly requests iterative refinement for higher code quality. Do NOT use for single-pass code generation (Lite mode), experiment pipeline orchestration (use experiment-pipeline), or diagnosing a specific experiment failure (use experiment-craft).
Static inspection of Triton operator code quality (Host side + Device side) for Ascend NPU. Used when users need to identify potential bugs, API misuses, and performance risks by reading code. Core capabilities: (1) Ascend API constraint compliance check (2) Mask integrity verification (3) Precision processing review (4) Code pattern recognition. Note: This Skill only focuses on static code analysis; compile-time and runtime issues are handled by other Skills.
Comprehensive iOS/SwiftUI code review with optional parallel agents
Add, remove, or adjust Markuplint rules for specific files or elements. Analyzes violations, proposes scope-appropriate configuration changes, and confirms with the user.
Python typing exclusion worker: remove assigned mypy exclusion modules in small scoped batches, fix typing issues, run validation, and produce a structured completion summary. Use when running parallel typing-debt workers or when asked to remove modules from pyproject mypy exclusion overrides.
Detects code smells and anti-patterns — long methods, large classes, feature envy, data clumps, primitive obsession, dead code, magic numbers, deep nesting, and more. Uses configurable thresholds from .codeprobe-config.json when available. Trigger phrases: "code smells", "smell check", "anti-patterns", "clean code review".
Reviews code for quality, security, tests, and project standards (PEP 8, type hints, VERSION, Docker, funcoes.md). Use when reviewing pull requests, code changes, or when the user asks for a code review or quality check.