Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,262 Skills
Comprehensive pull request review using specialized agents
Code style and quality rules for Megatron Bridge — ruff configuration, naming conventions, type hints, mypy rules, docstrings, copyright headers, logging, and the code review checklist.
Complete Python gotchas reference. PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) Mutable default arguments, (2) Mutating lists while iterating, (3) is vs == comparison, (4) Late binding in closures, (5) Variable scope (LEGB), (6) Floating point precision, (7) Exception handling pitfalls, (8) Dict mutation during iteration, (9) Circular imports, (10) Class vs instance attributes. Provides: Problem explanations, code examples, fixes for each gotcha. Ensures bug-free Python code.
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
Ejecutar la batería de verificaciones automatizadas de un proyecto TypeScript/Node antes de aceptar una implementación como apta para merge - `tsc --noEmit` (crítico, fail-fast), `eslint` (calidad), suite de tests (comportamiento), `build` (integración) y `sonar-scanner` (análisis estático). Usar siempre que el usuario pida "revisión de código", "code review", "valida el código", "ejecuta los checks", "revisa antes de PR/merge", o tras terminar una historia o TK que toque código TS. Devolver un informe Markdown con estado por check, errores agrupados, veredicto (apto / no apto / incompleto) y próximas acciones priorizadas. No corrige código ni modifica configuración.
Review generated or changed production code before it ships, using Clean Code, SOLID, DRY, KISS, YAGNI, and LLM-specific failure-mode checks in any programming language. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, refactors, or fixes code, before presenting, committing, or merging the result. Use when the user asks "review this PR", "is this safe to merge?", "make this cleaner", "audit this code", "refactor this", "fix this bug", or after a coding agent produced implementation code. Can also guide writing when explicitly invoked before a risky edit. DO NOT USE for factual/conceptual questions, CI/tooling config, git workflow, running/debugging tests, pure architecture discussion, prose writing, data analysis, or test-code review (use test-guard).
Validate your code changes through the no-mistakes pipeline - automated code review, tests, lint, docs, push, PR, and CI - before they reach upstream. Use when the user asks to run no-mistakes, gate or ship or validate their changes, push safely, asks you to do a task and then validate it, or invokes /no-mistakes.
Guide for using ty, the extremely fast Python type checker and language server. Use this when type checking Python code or setting up type checking in Python projects.
Validate that all rules have proper enforcement classification (enforce/check/guidance)
AI SDLC code review workflow. Use when an AI assistant is asked to review a diff, PR, branch, commit, staged changes, or completed implementation against SDD requirements, tests, API contracts, security, and scope discipline. Supports `--quick-flow` for fast assumption-driven execution and `--full-flow` for question-driven verified execution.
Compare React Doctor diagnostics for a GitHub pull request (PR) with Daytona. Use when asked to run parity, check a PR for diagnostic regressions, compare a PR with its base, or report added and removed diagnostics.
Use when performing a CTO-level PR review — includes staging evidence gate for infra/backend PRs.