Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,076 Skills
Review a diff for clarity and safe simplifications, then optionally apply low-risk fixes.
Reads documented bugs from bugs.md, analyzes root causes, implements fixes with regression tests, and validates the full test suite. Prioritizes fixes by severity (high to low). Updates bugs.md with correction status and generates a final bugfix report. Use when the user asks to fix bugs, resolve issues, or run the bugfix workflow for a feature. Do not use for new feature implementation, code review, or QA testing.
Detect package managers and discover outdated or vulnerable dependencies. Returns structured findings without upgrading. Use when the user asks to "review dependencies", "check for outdated packages", "check dependencies", "scan dependencies", or "dependency review".
Comprehensive Rust coding guidelines covering ownership, error handling, async patterns, traits, testing, performance, clippy, and documentation. Use when writing new Rust code, reviewing or refactoring existing Rust, implementing async systems with Tokio, designing error hierarchies, choosing between borrowing and cloning, setting up tests or benchmarks, configuring linting, or optimizing performance. Do not use for non-Rust languages or general software architecture unrelated to Rust idioms.
**Mandatory** before any commit or push. Run Definition-of-Done checks from change scope and report exact pass/fail per command.
Phase 2 of the feature workflow — Write code according to the implementation sequence in {slug}-design.md, and submit a completion report in a unified format for user review after finishing. Prerequisites: {slug}-design.md has been approved (standard design includes test design, or fastforward design includes acceptance criteria), and {slug}-checklist.yaml exists in the same directory. Trigger scenarios: User says "The plan is confirmed, start implementation", "Write code according to the plan", "Start working". If you encounter situations not covered by the plan during implementation (new concepts, out-of-scope files, need for patch branches), proactively stop and discuss with the user based on the plan, do not proceed forcefully.
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
Run OpenAI Codex CLI as an independent reviewer over the current branch, a specific commit, or uncommitted changes. Builds a focused instruction file from the real diff and returns a compact review summary.
Shortcut alias for /superplan. Produce higher-quality code by breaking a feature into small, focused tasks the coding agent can nail one at a time. Works like an engineering team: feature → milestones → ~30-min tasks with specific files, acceptance criteria, and dependencies. Each task runs in a fresh context — narrow scope, full attention, one git commit per task.
Acts as a Senior Staff Engineer to enforce high-quality software development standards. Use this skill when the user asks for code implementation, architectural review, debugging, or technical design. It ensures all code is production-ready, typed, and architecturally sound.
Use this after receiving code review feedback and before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear or technically questionable—requires technical rigor and verification, not perfunctory agreement or blind execution
Used when implementing any feature or fixing bugs, before writing the implementation code