Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,308 Skills
OpenTelemetry with Grafana stack. Covers OTel SDK instrumentation for Go/Java/Python/Node.js/.NET, OTLP protocol and endpoint configuration, sending telemetry to Grafana Cloud via OTLP endpoint, Grafana Alloy as OTel collector, sampling strategies, Kubernetes OTel Operator, and migration from other observability tools. Use when instrumenting apps with OTel, configuring OTLP endpoints, setting up collectors, or migrating to OpenTelemetry.
MUST activate when the project contains a uiBundles/*/src/ directory and the task involves ANY Salesforce record operation — reading, creating, updating, or deleting. Use this skill when building forms that submit to Salesforce, pages that display Salesforce records, or any code that touches Salesforce objects or custom objects. Activate when files under uiBundles/*/src/ import from @salesforce/sdk-data, or when *.graphql files or codegen.yml exist. This skill owns all Salesforce data access patterns in UI bundles. Does not apply to authentication/OAuth setup, schema changes, Bulk/Tooling/Metadata API, or declarative automation.
MUST activate when the project contains a uiBundles/*/src/ directory and the task involves uploading, attaching, or dropping files. Use this skill when adding file upload functionality to a UI bundle app. Provides progress tracking and Salesforce ContentVersion integration. This feature provides programmatic APIs ONLY — build custom UI using the upload() API. ALWAYS use this instead of building file upload from scratch with FormData or XHR.
Phase 2 of the feature workflow —— Write code according to the implementation sequence in {slug}-design.md, and submit a completion report in a unified format for user review after finishing. Prerequisites: {slug}-design.md has been approved (standard design includes test design, or fastforward design includes acceptance criteria), and {slug}-checklist.yaml exists in the same directory. Trigger scenarios: User says "The plan is confirmed, start implementation", "Write code according to the plan", "Start working". If you encounter situations not covered by the plan during implementation (new concepts, out-of-scope files, need for patch branches), proactively stop and go back to discuss the plan instead of pushing forward blindly.
Write or update external guide documents for the project —— dev-guide (for contributors/integrators/downstream developers) and user-guide (for end users). The output is stored in the project's docs/ directory, maintained alongside the code, and searchable by search tools. Difference from libdoc: guidedoc is task-oriented ("How to do Y with X"), while libdoc is reference-oriented ("What each part of X looks like"). Trigger scenarios: When the user says "write documentation", "developer guide", "user guide", or proactively push at the end of feature-acceptance.
Break down a requirement that is "too large to be implemented as a single feature" into a list of sub-features with dependencies and statuses, and place it in the independent `codestable/roadmap/{slug}/` directory — serving as the seed and scheduling basis for subsequent multiple feature processes. Two modes: new (draft a new roadmap from a large requirement), update (refresh an existing roadmap: add items, modify dependencies, reorder, mark as drop). Division of labor with requirements / architecture — those two record "what the system is now", while the roadmap records "what we plan to do next". Trigger scenarios: Users say "I want an X system", "Help me break down this requirement", "Schedule this large requirement", "Create a roadmap", or it is found during the feature-design phase that the requirement is too large to fit into a single feature.
One-stop skill for the project architecture center — draft new architecture documents, refresh existing ones, or conduct an architecture health check. Automatically determine the mode based on user input: `new` (draft)/ `update` (refresh to latest code status)/ `check` (review without modification, generate issue list). The `check` mode has three sub-objectives: consistency within a single feature design, alignment between design and code, and consistency among multiple documents under `codestable/architecture/`. Single-target rule — only modify one document or check one target at a time. Trigger scenarios: User says "fill in an architecture doc", "draft an architecture document", "refresh the architecture directory", "write down this module structure", "conduct an architecture check", "is the design internally consistent?", "does the plan match the code?", "are there conflicts among several documents in the architecture folder?", or when an architecture action is required before proceeding during the feature-design / feature-acceptance / implement phases.
Phase 2 of the issue process — Read the issue report + read the code, identify the true root cause and assess repair risks, and finally provide users with 2-3 repair solution options for them to decide. **Do NOT start modifying code in this phase** — present the conclusions to the user after analysis, and only proceed to Phase 3 after the user confirms the solution. Prerequisite: cs-issue-report has been completed. Trigger scenarios: The user says "Analyze this bug", "Find the root cause", "Locate the issue", and {slug}-report.md already exists in the issue directory.
Draft or update requirement documents under `codestable/requirements/` for the project — use **user stories + plain language** to describe a capability's "reason for existence, solution approach, and boundaries", so non-technical readers can quickly understand the highlights of the system. Layered with architecture: requirement is the "problem space" (why this capability is needed), while architecture is the "solution space" (what structure is used to implement it). Two modes: new (draft a new requirement doc from scratch), update (refresh an existing doc based on new materials or implementation changes). Single-target rule — only modify one document at a time. Trigger scenarios: the user says "fill in a requirement doc", "write down the requirements for this capability", "update the requirements directory", or during the feature-design phase, it is found that there is no corresponding requirement for the capability to be implemented this time.
Onboard a new repository or a repository with scattered documents into the CodeStable system. Two paths are automatically determined: the empty repository path (no spec-type documents or codestable/ directory in the repository) builds the skeleton from scratch; the migration path (the repository already has scattered documents or partial codestable/ structure) first generates an audit report + migration mapping plan, which is finalized after user confirmation one by one. This skill only does two things: "build the skeleton" and "organize existing documents". Once the skeleton is built, all sub-workflows can run directly. Trigger scenarios: Users say "Use CodeStable in this project", "Build CodeStable structure", "Initialize CodeStable", "Migrate to CodeStable".
The root entry of the CodeStable workflow family — introduces the overall system to users and routes users' specific requests to the correct cs-* sub-skills. Trigger scenarios: users only input `cs` / `/cs`, say "introduce codestable", "do something with codestable", "I want to do X, which skill should I use", "don't know which one to use", or users' described requests are open-ended (e.g., "start working") and haven't converged to a specific sub-skill. This skill itself **does not perform actual tasks** — it doesn't write specs, write code, or read/write content products in the codestable/ directory — it only performs scanning, routing, prompting, and then transfers control to the target sub-skill.
Nassim Taleb's Antifragility framework applied to a business idea, system, or portfolio position. Spawns a team of specialist agents — Fat-Tail Detector, Fragility Auditor, Optionality Scout, Iatrogenics Checker, Skin-in-the-Game Auditor — who each apply a distinct lens from Taleb's Incerto to evaluate whether the subject is fragile, robust, or antifragile. The lead synthesizes into a convexity assessment: what's the payoff structure under disorder, where are the hidden tail risks, and the honest Taleb verdict. Use when the user says "taleb this", "is this fragile", "antifragility analysis", "what would Taleb think", "tail risk check", or proposes a business/system and wants structural risk analysis. Works standalone or after /munger for complementary analysis.