Loading...
Loading...
Found 98 Skills
Use when reviewing dashboard JSON changes in a PR or branch. Extracts structured descriptions with kbdash, compares before/after, and checks guideline compliance.
Review Argos visual regression builds as one input to a pull request review. Use when a PR has an Argos build link, an Argos status check, or a bot comment pointing to an Argos build, and you need to decide whether the visual diffs match the developer's intent before approving.
Git worktree を使った複数ブランチの同時作業管理。 使用タイミング: (1) 複数機能を並行開発したい時 (2) PRレビュー中に別作業したい時 (3) 本番ホットフィックスと開発を同時進行したい時 (4) worktreeの使い方を知りたい時。 トリガー例: 「worktreeで」「別ブランチを同時に」「並行開発したい」 「PRレビューしながら開発」「ホットフィックス用のworktree」
Perform a code review with linting, standards checking, and priority-ranked findings
Review code through hostile perspectives to find bugs, security issues, and unintended consequences the author missed. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing codebases, or before critical deployments.
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Python, Django, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, NestJS, C/C++, and more. Helps catch bugs, improve code quality, and give constructive feedback. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
Conduct thorough code reviews with structured feedback on security, performance, architecture, and testing. Generates trackable review documents with prioritized issues (critical/required/suggestions) and educational content. Use when reviewing PRs or code changes. Triggers on "review this code", "code review", "review PR".
Agent Skill for Swift architecture design and implementation patterns, with architecture-specific playbooks and review checklists. Use when designing new features, refactoring existing modules, reviewing pull requests, or debugging maintainability issues in SwiftUI/UIKit projects and you need concrete guidance for MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, VIPER, or Reactive patterns.
Analyzes code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. Identifies misleading comments, comment rot, and documentation gaps. Triggers: After adding documentation, before finalizing a PR, when reviewing comments. Examples: - "Check if the comments are accurate" -> verifies comments match code behavior - "Review the documentation I added" -> analyzes new comments for quality - "Analyze comments for technical debt" -> finds outdated or misleading comments - "Are my docstrings correct?" -> validates documentation accuracy
Code review — both giving and receiving feedback. Verifying observed behavior over performative agreement. Use when reviewing a PR, requesting review on completed work, or processing review feedback you received.
Performs a structured code review on the current diff or specified files. Checks for correctness, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, code style, and adherence to the project's architecture patterns. Invoked when the user asks for a review, code check, pr review, or quality assessment.
Compares competing PRs that target the same issue and recommends which one to merge. Runs gate, correctness, and quality checks; outputs a deterministic scorecard with reasoning trace. Use when an issue has two or more open PRs and a maintainer needs to decide which to merge.