Loading...
Loading...
Found 269 Skills
Analyze a startup from three perspectives: VC investor, job applicant, and CEO/founder. Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate a startup, assess whether to invest in or join a startup, do due diligence, evaluate a job offer from a startup, understand a startup's competitive position, or assess company health and trajectory. Triggers: "analyze this startup", "should I join [company]", "is [company] a good investment", "evaluate [company]", "due diligence on [company]", "what do you think of [startup]", "should I take this startup job offer", "how healthy is [company]", "startup assessment", "company analysis", "is [company] worth joining", "what's the outlook for [company]", "research [company] for me", any mention of evaluating or assessing a startup or tech company from investment, career, or strategic perspectives — provide all three perspectives by default.
Host simulated panel discussions and debates among AI-simulated domain experts. Supports roundtable, Oxford-style, and Socratic formats with heterogeneous expert personas, anti-groupthink mechanisms, and structured synthesis. Use when exploring complex topics from multiple expert perspectives, testing argument strength, academic brainstorming, or understanding trade-offs in decisions. NOT for one-on-one conversations, simple Q&A, or real-time debates.
Structured roundtable discussion framework with a truth-seeking moderator who invites representative figures for dialectical debate on any topic. Use when the user says "roundtable discussion", "roundtable", "debate", or wants to explore a topic through multi-perspective structured debate.
Run multi-source deep research with Firecrawl. Use when the user asks to research a topic, compare perspectives, produce a sourced briefing, investigate a technical or market question, or synthesize web evidence across many sources.
Analyzes events through sociological lens using social structures, institutions, stratification, culture, norms, collective behavior, and multiple theoretical perspectives (functionalist, conflict, symbolic interactionist). Provides insights on social patterns, group dynamics, inequality, socialization, social change, and collective action. Use when: Social movements, inequality, cultural trends, group behavior, institutions, identity, social change. Evaluates: Social structures, power relations, inequality, norms, group dynamics, cultural patterns, social change.
Comprehensive multi-stage code review using specialized subagents. Use when reviewing PRs with complex architectural impact, security concerns, or when thorough multi-perspective analysis is needed.
Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis with citations.
Multi-agent code review with specialized perspectives (security, performance, patterns, simplification, tests)
Interactive brainstorming with parallel subagent collaboration, idea expansion, and documented thought evolution. Parallel multi-perspective analysis for Codex.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
Performs comprehensive PR code review from 5 perspectives (quality/performance/tests/docs/security) in parallel, providing Blockers/Suggestions/Nice-to-have and merge decision. Args: /review [owner/repo] [pr-number] [--focus all|security|perf|qa|docs|types] Activates when user mentions "review", "PR確認", "コードレビュー", "マージ判定".
Enrich a Phase Sepc/PRD with Quality Requirements (Q-nnn) and Acceptance Criteria (AC-nnnn). Use when user wants to add QA perspective, define test criteria, identify non-functional requirements, add verification steps, or prepare a Phase PRD for test planning.