Loading...
Loading...
Found 264 Skills
Runs a second-pass cleanup over AI-written code using the repo's style guide in style.md. Prefers parallel subagents to simplify recently modified files without changing behavior. Use when the user says "deslop", "clean this up", "make this less AI", "apply my style guide", "second pass", or asks to simplify generated code after implementation.
Aggressively clean up a codebase by removing AI slop, dead code, weak types, defensive over-engineering, duplication, and legacy cruft. Orchestrates 8 specialized subagents in parallel to deduplicate code, consolidate types, kill unused code, untangle circular dependencies, strengthen weak types, remove unnecessary try/catch, delete deprecated/legacy paths, and strip unhelpful comments. Use when the user asks to 'clean up the codebase', 'remove slop', 'improve code quality', 'remove dead code', 'kill AI slop', 'tighten types', 'remove legacy code', 'deduplicate code', 'DRY this up', 'untangle dependencies', or wants a thorough code quality pass. Also use when the user mentions code smells, technical debt cleanup, or refactoring for clarity — even if they don't use the word 'slop'.
Vi — HR Specialist and Execution Orchestrator for MEL/SRHR work. Receives an approved plan from Ann (or directly from Ane), designs the specialist roster, spawns specialists as subagents, reviews their outputs, compiles the final product, and returns it. General-purpose — invoked by Ann via Agent tool, or directly by Ane when a plan is already approved.
Drive the Codex review cycle on an open PR. Polls Codex comments, classifies severity (P0/P1 blocking, P2/nit ignored), applies fixes via subagent or escalates to a different worker on round 3, labels needs-human and stops on round 4. Auto-merges when all merge gates are green.
Analyzes current conversation context to recommend the best skills and subagents for the task at hand. Use proactively when unsure which tool, skill, or agent to use.
Validate whether an implementation matches its stated goal. Use this skill when a skill or agent wants a second opinion on its own output, when the user says "check this implementation", "validate what you did", "is this correct?", "review the output", or "did you do this right?". Also spawned automatically as a subagent by other skills (memory-bridge, daily-update) to self-check their outputs before presenting to the user. Returns a structured pass/warn/fail verdict with specific actionable issues.
Creates or audits a Claude Code subagent file. Use when user says 'create an agent', 'build a subagent', 'review this agent', 'audit our agents', 'add a code-reviewer agent', or 'our agents are too broad'. Do NOT use for skills (use create-or-audit-skill), hooks (use create-or-audit-hook), or CLAUDE.md files (use create-or-audit-claude-md).
Task management for session continuity. Use when coordinating multi-step work, managing subagent assignments, or preserving intent across compaction. Triggers on "track tasks", "manage work", "coordinate agents", or when complex work requires sequencing.
Use when explicitly asked to run the security-reviewer subagent or when another skill requires the security-reviewer agent card.
Guide for creating and maintaining project documentation (README, guides, API specs). Emphasizes doc/code synchronization, consistency checks, and use of the docs-excellence-architect subagent.
Comprehensive code investigation and audit tool. Discovers all project features, then dispatches parallel subagents to analyze issues, risks, dead code, missing functionality, and redundancies. Produces a prioritized risk report. Use this skill when the user asks to "investigate code", "audit project", "find risks", "check code quality", "analyze codebase", "what's wrong with this code", "project health check", "code review entire project", "find dead code", "find redundant code", or any request for a thorough codebase analysis.
Use when asked to trace existing codepaths or explicitly asked to run the code-explorer subagent.