Loading...
Loading...
Found 974 Skills
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware with per-person contributions, praise, and growth areas. Use when asked for weekly retro, what shipped this week, or engineering retrospective.
Performs a structured code review on the current diff or specified files. Checks for correctness, security vulnerabilities, test coverage, code style, and adherence to the project's architecture patterns. Invoked when the user asks for a review, code check, pr review, or quality assessment.
Refactors specified code to improve clarity, reduce duplication, or align with the project's architectural patterns — without changing external behavior. Invoked when the user asks to refactor, clean up, simplify, or restructure code.
Use this skill when > Configure automated code quality checks at commit time using Husky and lint-staged. Sets up pre-commit hooks for formatting (Prettier), type checking, and tests. Adapts to existing project configurations and omits missing scripts gracefully.
Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.
Comprehensive Rust code review across four lenses — source code (ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, errors, trait design, unsafe, common mistakes), tests (unit, integration, async testing, mocking, property-based), tokio async (task management, sync primitives, channels), and FFI (extern blocks,
Findings-first review discipline for code, diffs, task plans, live workflow changes, and implementation evidence.
Use when writing or reviewing Move smart contracts on Sui. Applies to naming structs, error constants, regular constants, events, getter functions, capability types, hot potato types, and dynamic field keys. Use whenever creating new types, functions, or constants in Move code.
Owns Python code style for this stack: ruff for lint + format, numpydoc for docstrings. Two responsibilities — (1) place the project's `ruff.toml` from the bundled template once the stack and workspace are in place, and (2) run ruff against any Python files Claude has just generated or edited. Stops at "the touched files pass `ruff check`." TRIGGER when (any of these): (1) a Python file was just created or edited via Write / Edit / MultiEdit — invoke this skill before declaring the task done so ruff is run on the touched files; (2) a fresh ML workspace was just scaffolded by `organize-ml-workspace` and the project has no `ruff.toml` at its root yet — drop the bundled template; (3) the user asks about lint, format, docstring style, or reaches for `black` / `isort` / `flake8` / `pydocstyle` (redirect to ruff — the stack's canonical linter, owned by `data-science-python-stack` Tier 1). SKIP when: the project is non-Python; the only edits in this turn are to Markdown / TOML / JSON / YAML; the file lives in a third-party vendored directory the user doesn't own. HOW TO USE: run ruff manually on the files you just touched — do not configure a PostToolUse hook for this. **Read the "Stop conditions" block and emit the Pre-flight checklist as visible text in your response — both are mandatory before running ruff.**
Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.
Review a diff, PR, branch, or path across ten orthogonal dimensions (correctness, security, encapsulation, spec, complexity, deslop, assertions, NIH, efficiency, telemetry) and emit a severity-grouped findings report. Use when the user wants a code review — phrases like "review this", "/age", "is this safe to merge", "find bugs", "spot security issues", "check for slop", "review my PR", "what's wrong with this code". Use even when the user only asks for one dimension — the report scopes itself. Do NOT use for applying fixes (route to /cure) or test hardening (route to /press).
Use when performing a first-pass, read-only PR review in a clean isolated context.