Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,261 Skills
Use this skill when validating ANY potential code review finding. Apply BEFORE classifying to verify the finding is real; can you trace incorrect behavior, is it handled elsewhere, and are you certain about framework semantics? If any answer is no, DO NOT create the finding.
Review git diffs, staged changes, and GitHub PRs. Change-focused analysis across seven pillars (Security, Performance, Architecture, Error Handling, Testing, Maintainability, Paranoia) with numeric scoring 1-10. Supports GitHub PR review, staged changes, and arbitrary diffs. Use when: reviewing a PR, reviewing staged changes, reviewing a diff, pre-commit review. Triggers: review PR, review my changes, review the diff, review staged, review-pr, check my changes.
Deep code simplification, refactoring, and quality refinement. Analyzes structural complexity, anti-patterns, and readability debt, then applies targeted refactoring preserving exact behavior. Language-agnostic: Python, Go, TypeScript/JavaScript, Rust. Use this skill when the goal is simplification and clarity rather than bug-finding. Triggers on: "simplify this code", "clean up my code", "refactor for clarity", "reduce complexity", "make this more readable", "code quality pass", "tech debt cleanup", "run the code refiner", "simplify recent changes", "this code is messy", "too much nesting", "this function is too long", "clean this up before I PR it", "tidy up my code", cyclomatic complexity, cognitive complexity, code smells.
Review code changes in Tenzir projects. Use when auditing diffs or pull requests for bugs, security issues, missing tests, documentation drift, readability problems, performance regressions, user experience issues, or when deciding how to respond to GitHub review comments. Also use this skill whenever the user says "review", "look at this PR", "check my changes", "audit this diff", "what do you think of this code", or asks for feedback on any code they've written or changed — even if they don't explicitly say "code review."
Run a multi-agent review of changed files for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues followed by automated fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".
This skill should be used when the user asks to "set up ESLint", "configure ESLint rules", "fix ESLint errors", "migrate to flat config", or needs guidance on JavaScript/TypeScript linting best practices.
Review RTK Rust code for idiomatic simplification. Detects over-engineering, unnecessary allocations, verbose patterns. Applies Rust idioms without changing behavior.
Review and simplify recently changed code for reuse, clarity, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use when the user asks to simplify, refine, polish, clean up, or make code clearer, after finishing a logical chunk of implementation that should be tightened before commit, or when asked to review changes since a specific commit or branch.
Run Python (ruff) and JavaScript (Biome) linting, formatting, and code quality checks with auto-fix support. Use when code needs linting, formatting, or style checking before commits. Use for "lint", "format", "ruff", "biome", "code style", or "check quality". Do NOT use for comprehensive code review (use systematic-code-review).
This skill should be used when the user asks to "audit this codebase", "audit this code", "security audit", "code audit", "find vulnerabilities", "check for bugs", "review code quality", "find dead code", "check for anti-patterns", "performance audit", "check for code smells", "technical debt", or "code health check".
Run Gemini CLI review against the current branch and report only the review comments that are still valid for the current codebase, without applying fixes.
Generate a comprehensive Sentry bug report. Use when the user explicitly asks to "generate a bug report".