Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,576 Skills
Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.
Interactive learning system for NetSuite SDF development. Features six modes (learn, review, explain, annotate, quiz, and final) with SAFE Guide integration. Produces compliance-reviewed learning documentation. Learn topics like governance, N/cache, and security directly from SAFE Guide principles. Generate quizzes from code or SAFE Guide content.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the triage skill", "run triage tests", "validate antithesis triage", "test:triage", or "smoke test triage". Orchestrates end-to-end testing of the antithesis-triage skill by running real triage operations via sub-agents and reviewing the results for bugs, skill compliance issues, and papercuts.
Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.
Test payment and checkout flows end to end against PSP sandboxes — Stripe first, with the general pattern for Adyen/Braintree/PayPal. Covers Stripe test-mode card numbers and their decline codes, the 3DS/SCA challenge flow and its nested-iframe handling in Playwright, test clocks for subscription/billing-cycle simulation, webhook testing (stripe listen/trigger, signature verification, idempotency), failed/retried payments and refunds, and never using real cards. Use when: "test Stripe checkout," "payment test," "3DS test," "test webhook signature," "test subscription renewal," "test clock," "refund test," "decline card test," "checkout E2E." Not for: General API contract testing of non-payment endpoints — api-testing. PCI-DSS/regulatory compliance audit — compliance-testing. Related: api-testing, playwright-automation, compliance-testing, test-data-management, qa-project-context.
Use when the user asks "what did we pay this creator last time" or to "update the creator roster"; curates creator identity, rate, rights, exclusivity, compliance-event, and performance facts through the append-only creators event stream. Not for scoring fit — use fit-scorer; not for reviewing content — use creator-content-auditor. 创作者档案/达人名册
Comprehensive SQL statement checking for Apache Doris (based on Doris 3.1.4 Nereids ANTLR4 grammar), supporting two check modes: 1. Syntax Check - Keyword validation, statement structure verification, clause completeness, Doris-specific syntax compatibility (DISTRIBUTED BY, PARTITION BY, ENGINE, DUPLICATE/AGGREGATE/UNIQUE KEY, INSERT OVERWRITE, LOAD, EXPORT, MTMV, BACKUP/RESTORE etc.) 2. Specification Check - Object design standards, data operation standards, naming conventions based on Apache Doris development best practices. Built-in custom Doris SQL tokenizer (504 keywords from DorisLexer.g4) and recursive descent parser supporting 100+ Doris statement types. Applicable when users need SQL quality review, syntax validation, or specification compliance checking for Apache Doris SQL (versions 2.1.x / 3.0.x / 3.1.x / 4.x). 触发词："Doris SQL检查"、"Doris SQL规范"、"Doris SQL审计"、"Doris SQL语法"、"检查Doris SQL"、"Doris SQL review"
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Interact with the Paperclip control plane API to manage tasks, coordinate with other agents, and follow company governance. Use when you need to check assignments, update task status, delegate work, post comments, set up or manage routines (recurring scheduled tasks), or call any Paperclip API endpoint. Do NOT use for the actual domain work itself (writing code, research, etc.) — only for Paperclip coordination.
Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Normalize design to match your design system and ensure consistency