Loading...
Loading...
Found 992 Skills
Migrate vision/detection/segmentation small models to Ascend NPU, covering the full workflow: model structure analysis, migration verification, performance profiling, and optimization. Based on torch_npu and msprof Use this skill when the user wants to: (1) migrate encoder-only models like ResNet, YOLO, UNet to Ascend NPU, (2) analyze model structure for migration feasibility, (3) verify model inference on NPU, (4) identify performance bottlenecks and get optimization suggestions Trigger: user mentions "migrate", "migration", "Ascend", "NPU", "YOLO", "ResNet", "encoder-only", "detection", "segmentation", "adaptation", "adapt", "迁移", "昇腾迁移", "小模型", "适配", "昇腾适配", "GPU迁移", "NPU适配", "适配NPU", "适配昇腾"
AI-native tutor and onboarding workflow for the four independent Claude certification tracks in AI Engineering from Scratch. Use when a learner wants to choose a Claude certification, prepare for CCAO-F, CCDV-F, CCAR-F, or CCAR-P, resume a certification path, learn the next lesson interactively, run and verify practical labs, build scored artifacts, take a diagnostic or mock exam, or remediate weak exam domains from GitHub with Claude Code, Codex, ChatGPT, Cursor, or another agent.
Real-time structural Code Health via CodeScene MCP — review before edits, verify score deltas after changes, gate commits and PRs. Use when reviewing code quality, refactoring, checking if AI changes degraded a file, or before commit/PR.
Configures Amazon SES V2 for production email sending — including domain identity creation, DKIM/SPF/DMARC authentication, one-shot DNS record presentation, and Route 53 automation — for developers setting up or troubleshooting SES domain verification and deliverability. Applicable when developers need to send emails from their domain via SES, verify a domain identity, configure email authentication, troubleshoot DKIM verification issues, or ensure their sending setup follows best practices. Not for email-address-only verification, Mail Manager inbound routing, SNS, Pinpoint, or WorkMail.
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
Review one or all open pull requests in saadeghi/daisyui using the GitHub MCP server and isolated base-versus-PR verification. Use when Codex must fact-check a daisyUI PR, verify that it solves its stated problem or linked issue, test concrete regression risks, explain developer experience before and after, decide whether it is safe to merge, and write a concise report under tmp/pr/. Base every report statement on linked sources, inspected code, or observed command output; never invent claims, risks, results, or confidence deductions.
Confirm a change before merge. `/check verify` drives the real app to prove behavior against the spec (every acceptance criterion met, every surface built). `/check review` runs a senior code review on a fresh model, one that did not write the code. Verify after /develop, review before a PR. Writes to docs/reviews/, never edits code.
Use this skill to review a Lightning Web Component (.html, .js, .css files) for right-to-left (RTL) internationalization correctness, producing a finding list with code-level fixes covering CSS logical properties, bidirectional text handling, keyboard semantics, and RTL-aware SLDS class usage. TRIGGER when the user says "review this LWC for RTL", "audit i18n compliance", "fix bidirectional text rendering", "replace left/right CSS with logical properties", "check RTL layout issues", "verify SLDS RTL classes", "review my component for Arabic/Hebrew layout", "ensure this LWC works in RTL locales", or "check bidi text handling". DO NOT TRIGGER when the user is building a new LWC (use experience-lwc-generate), refactoring SLDS classes themselves (use design-systems-slds-apply or design-systems-slds2-migrate), or performing accessibility/security review.
Use the PlanetScale CLI (pscale) from automated agents with --format json, auth check, pscale sql, and per-command --force. Run before other PlanetScale skills when driving pscale directly. Use when the user asks to automate pscale, run CLI commands headless, or verify pscale auth from an agent.
Use when creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization - applies RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle to process documentation by running baseline without skill, writing to address failures, iterating to close loopholes
Guide for creating effective skills. This command should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Claude's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations. Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment - applies TDD to process documentation by testing with subagents before writing, iterating until bulletproof against rationalization