Loading...
Loading...
Found 98 Skills
Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.
Code review and PR review skill for Python PySide6/Qt 6.8+ applications. Focuses on modern best practices, performance, thread safety, signal/slot patterns, Model/View architecture, QML integration, and async patterns. Use when reviewing Python Qt code, PySide6 PRs, GUI application code, or when asked to review code that uses QtWidgets, QtQuick, QtCore, QtGui, or any Qt module. Catches common anti-patterns, memory issues, thread violations, and suggests modern Qt 6.8+ idioms.
Commit standards for Engram contributors. Trigger: Any commit creation, review, or branch cleanup.
4-phase code review methodology: UNDERSTAND changes, VERIFY claims against code, ASSESS security/performance/architecture risks, DOCUMENT findings with severity classification. Use when reviewing pull requests, auditing code before release, evaluating external contributions, or pre-merge verification. Use for "review PR", "code review", "audit code", "check this PR", or "review my changes". Do NOT use for writing new code or implementing features.
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Use when reviewing PRs or standardizing review practices.
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Perform SGLang code review in the style of human maintainers by consulting the 2024-2025 non-agent PR review corpus, including inline code snippets, original multilingual comments, and discussion threads. Use when reviewing SGLang PRs, diffs, patches, or local changes for correctness, tests, performance, GPU/runtime risks, API compatibility, and maintainability.
Use when reviewing code, pull requests, patches, CLs, diffs, or proposed implementations for engineering quality, code health, design, functionality, tests, maintainability, specialist risk, or approval risk. TRIGGER on "review this PR", "code review", "LGTM?", "approve?", "is this code/diff/change safe to merge/deploy?", and local diff reviews. DO NOT TRIGGER for PR descriptions, PR splitting, author review-feedback responses, or non-code safety questions unless code review is requested.
Use when working on multiple branches simultaneously, context switching without stashing, reviewing PRs while developing, testing in isolation, or comparing implementations across branches - provides git worktree commands and workflow patterns for parallel development with multiple working directories.
Use when working on multiple branches simultaneously, context switching without stashing, reviewing PRs while developing, testing in isolation, or comparing implementations across branches - provides git worktree commands and workflow patterns for parallel development with multiple working directories.
Review code for bugs, security issues, and best practices. Use when asked to review a PR, diff, or code snippet.
Delegate coding to OpenCode CLI (features, PR review).