Loading...
Loading...
Found 10,000 Skills
Used when completing tasks, implementing important features, or before merging to verify whether the work results meet the requirements
Generate and critically evaluate grounded ideas about a topic. Use when asking what to improve, requesting idea generation, exploring surprising directions, or wanting the AI to proactively suggest strong options before brainstorming one in depth. Triggers on phrases like 'what should I improve', 'give me ideas', 'ideate on X', 'surprise me', 'what would you change', or any request for AI-generated suggestions rather than refining the user's own idea.
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying if skills are valid before deployment
Run a structured multi-perspective council on a hard decision, design choice, debugging question, strategy problem, or tradeoff. Use when the user wants multiple viewpoints, explicit cross-examination, and a compact final verdict.
X (Twitter) data platform skill — tweet search, user lookup, follower extraction, engagement metrics, giveaway draws, monitoring, webhooks, 19 extraction tools, MCP server.
Use when a complex MEL/SRHR task requires deep evidence synthesis before planning begins. Triggered by Ann between PHASE 1 and PHASE 2 for COMPLEX tasks, or directly by Ane for standalone literature reviews.
Start a Ralph Loop for iterative self-referential development. Use when the user asks to run a ralph loop, start an iterative loop, or wants repeated autonomous iteration on a task until completion.
Interview the user relentlessly about whatever they want to work on — a plan, task, design, idea, feature, architecture decision, or anything else — until reaching shared understanding. Walk the decision tree one branch at a time, resolving dependencies between decisions. Use when the user says "grill me", wants to stress-test a plan or idea, wants to be interviewed about a design, or wants to flesh out an under-specified task.
Persistent project-scoped store for deep research on large topics. Use for substantive questions - comparing libraries, evaluating tools, surveying solutions to hard problems. Not for plan notes, not for small facts, not for code-level decisions, not for ideas.
Comprehensive multi-perspective review using specialized judges with debate and consensus building
Replace with a clear description of what this skill does and when Claude should use it. Be specific about trigger words and use cases.
Guided, section-by-section GDD authoring for a single game system. Gathers context from existing docs, walks through each required section collaboratively, cross-references dependencies, and writes incrementally to file.