Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,263 Skills
Best Practices Guide for Tauri Framework. Use Cases: Tauri Application Development, Code Review, Architecture Design
Enforces strict Spec-Driven Development. Prevents direct coding and ensures spec → generate → review loops.
Submit pull request (PR) review from chat session to PR conversations. Use when asked to "submit PR review" or "submit review to PR #123". Identifies issues in the current chat session, creates line-specific review comments, avoids duplication with existing comments, and submits the review via GitHub CLI.
Runs .continue/agents checks locally against the current diff, simulating the GitHub PR checks experience. Use when the user says /check to review their changes before pushing.
Verify that a pull request or local changes fully implement the requirements described in a linked GitHub issue. Use when asked to "verify PR 123", "verify my changes", "check PR #123 coverage", "verify PR #123 against issue #42", "check local changes", or "do my changes cover issue 42". Analyzes the diff against issue requirements and reports either missing items or confirms 100% coverage.
Acts as a Principal Software Engineer to review completed or in-progress work against project standards, tech stack choices, and the implementation plan. Use when the user wants a quality check on their code or before finalizing a track.
Evaluate every produced output (code, report, plan, data, API response) against type-specific quality criteria, score 1-10, make accept/reject decisions, and provide actionable improvement suggestions. Triggers on "evaluate", "check", "review", "quality control", "is this good enough", "score it", or before passing output to the next step in an agentic workflow.
Guidance for writing, reviewing, and debugging Unreal Editor for Fortnite (UEFN) Verse code using Epic's official language documentation. Use when implementing Verse devices, classes, functions, control flow, containers, failure contexts, specifiers/attributes, modules/imports, effects, concurrency, or translating logic into valid Verse.
Use when asked to fix, resolve, or address a GitHub PR — including review comments, Copilot suggestions, and CI test failures. Triggers on phrases like "fix PR", "fix PR comments", "resolve review", "address Copilot feedback", "fix review comments", "fix CI", "fix failing tests on PR", or when given a PR number to fix.
Review current uncommitted git changes with full file context and produce a structured report with severity levels, actionable fixes, and an approval verdict.
Branch and PR workflow for Engram contributors. Trigger: When starting any change that will be proposed through GitHub.
Iterative codebase quality audit with multi-agent validation and escalating-depth SEEK/VALIDATE/FIX/RECURSE cycle. Use for quality audit, code audit, codebase review, technical debt audit, refactoring opportunities, module quality check, or architecture review.