Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,232 Skills
Perform a thorough quality review of a pull request or feature branch before merging. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review a PR, check if code is production-ready, assess quality, verify docs are updated, or asks "is this ready to merge?", "review this PR", "check quality", "is this production ready?", or similar. Also use when reviewing your own work before submitting.
Shortcut alias for /superplan. Produce higher-quality code by breaking a feature into small, focused tasks the coding agent can nail one at a time. Works like an engineering team: feature → milestones → ~30-min tasks with specific files, acceptance criteria, and dependencies. Each task runs in a fresh context — narrow scope, full attention, one git commit per task.
Phase 2 of the feature workflow —— Write code according to the implementation sequence in {slug}-design.md, and submit a completion report in a unified format for user review after finishing. Prerequisites: {slug}-design.md has been approved (standard design includes test design, or fastforward design includes acceptance criteria), and {slug}-checklist.yaml exists in the same directory. Trigger scenarios: User says "The plan is confirmed, start implementation", "Write code according to the plan", "Start working". If you encounter situations not covered by the plan during implementation (new concepts, out-of-scope files, need for patch branches), proactively stop and go back to discuss the plan instead of pushing forward blindly.
Ultra-lightweight channel for refactor processes - used when changes are clearly too small to go through the full scan → design → apply three-stage workflow. AI directly identifies 1-3 low-risk optimization points, confirms with the user once, modifies in-place using classic methods, and validates itself by running tests. No scan checklist, no design documentation, no multi-step human verification required. Trigger scenarios: User says "quick refactor", "small refactor", "simply optimize XX function", "modify directly", "skip the extra steps", and the scope of changes is clearly localized to a single function / single component with test coverage for self-validation.
Code review using the reviewer agent
Analyze repository and suggest improvements
Code review — both giving and receiving feedback. Verifying observed behavior over performative agreement. Use when reviewing a PR, requesting review on completed work, or processing review feedback you received.
Comprehensive Python development skill covering coding standards, CLI development, linting, testing, debugging, refactoring, code review, auditing, documentation, project planning, and bulk operations. Use when writing, reviewing, refactoring, debugging, or documenting Python code; configuring linters; setting up CLI tools; planning features; performing code audits; or handling bulk operations (10+ files) that need 90%+ token savings.
[Hyper] Run deploy-readiness validation and fix reproduced lint/typecheck/build blockers for Node.js, Rust, and Python repos. Use for pre-deploy checks, deploy-ready requests, or final quality/build gates before deployment.
Verify code quality including naming conventions, organization, documentation, and general best practices. Use when asked to "verify quality", "check code quality", or "review code organization".
Code quality dashboard. Wraps existing project tools (type checker, linter, test runner, dead code detector, shell linter), computes a weighted composite 0-10 score, and tracks trends over time. Use when: "health check", "code quality", "how healthy is the codebase", "run all checks", "quality score". (gstack)
Use when naming or renaming TypeScript identifiers, especially cryptic names, ambiguous parameters, I-prefixed interfaces, Hungarian notation, misleading side effects, or requests for clearer names.