Loading...
Loading...
Found 1,170 Skills
Orchestrate parallel implementation with coder/overseer pairs. Coders implement decomposed tasks using evanflow-tdd; overseers review each coder's output for bugs, gaps, errors, AND cohesion violations against a shared contract. A final integration overseer checks cross-coder cohesion. Use for plans with 3+ truly independent tasks that share an interface contract.
Adversarial code review with anti-trust verification. Verifies every implementer claim against the actual diff. Use when reviewing PRs, branches, or recent commits.
Unified review skill — auto-detects plan or code, assembles the right panel, runs a bounded review-fix loop with severity gating. Use when a plan or implementation needs review.
Generate a visual diff review page (ArchitectureGrid for impacted modules + CodeDiff for hunks + Callouts for risks) from a git range, PR URL, or pasted diff. Use whenever the user asks for a PR review, diff summary, change impact analysis, or pastes `git diff` output. Requires the `hyperscribe` skill (renderer engine).
Vue2 Frontend Code Review Assistant. Reviews code changes in the src directory of Vue2 projects. Covers 9 major dimensions: component specifications, code style, naming, logic, network requests, computed, security, best practices, and absolute prohibitions. Trigger scenarios: pre-merge review, pre-commit quality check, Code Review for Vue2 code.
Expert application security engineer specializing in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment, secure code review, and security architecture design for modern web and cloud-native applications.
Validate whether an implementation matches its stated goal. Use this skill when a skill or agent wants a second opinion on its own output, when the user says "check this implementation", "validate what you did", "is this correct?", "review the output", or "did you do this right?". Also spawned automatically as a subagent by other skills (memory-bridge, daily-update) to self-check their outputs before presenting to the user. Returns a structured pass/warn/fail verdict with specific actionable issues.
This skill should be used when the user wants to write, review, or refactor TypeScript code to follow industry best practices. Common triggers include "follow ts best practices", "review this typescript", "fix the typescript style", "make this idiomatic typescript", "apply typescript conventions", and "audit this ts file". Bakes in branded types, discriminated unions, ts-pattern for multi-branch logic, JSDoc on exports, kebab-case file naming, and *Params/*Options object-arg conventions. Skip when the user wants pure functional refactors (use ts-best-practices-functional) or is writing framework components (React/Vue/Svelte have different conventions).
Run Kiro CLI as an independent reviewer over the current branch, a specific commit, or uncommitted changes. Builds a focused prompt from the real diff and returns a compact review summary.
Perform read-only reviews of code changes (`git diff`) for quality, architecture compliance, and security (OWASP Top 10) by delegating to Agent tools. Use for self-reviews before committing/creating PRs, or when requesting "review changes" or "code review". Use implement-review-pr for GitHub PR reviews.
Adversarial code review that breaks the self-review monoculture. Use when you want a genuinely critical review of recent changes, before merging a PR, or when you suspect Claude is being too agreeable about code quality. Forces perspective shifts through hostile reviewer personas that catch blind spots the author's mental model shares with the reviewer.
Security-first skill vetting protocol for AI agents. Use before installing any skill from the platform skill market, skillhub, GitHub, or other sources. Checks for red flags, permission scope, and suspicious patterns to determine whether a skill is safe to install.