Loading...
Loading...
Found 10 Skills
Use when you need to actually write inspection script code and implement an automation checker based on the design scheme of assess-automation-checklist; output runnable script files and integration guides. Trigger words: write inspection script, implement automatic inspection, code checker, write checker code.
Find evidence instead of guessing for .NET packages, platform libraries, local assemblies, APIs, dependencies, and version-to-version API changes.
Review code changes against a plan using the plan location and implementing git commit(s).
Guide for making code reviews. Use this when asked to make code reviews, or ask to use it before committing changes.
Ascend C Code Inspection Skill. Conduct security specification inspection on code based on the hypothesis testing methodology. When calling, you must clearly provide: code snippets and inspection rule descriptions. TRIGGER when: Users request code inspection, code review, ask code security questions, check coding specifications, or need to check specific code issues (such as memory leaks, integer overflows, null pointers, etc.). Keywords: Ascend C, code inspection, code review, security specification, memory, pointer, overflow, leak, coding specification.
Inspeccionar un proyecto existente para descubrir decisiones arquitectónicas implícitas y proponer ADRs candidatos. Usar cuando el usuario quiera auditar un repositorio en busca de decisiones no documentadas, pida "descubrir ADRs", "qué decisiones arquitectónicas tiene este proyecto", "busca ADRs en el repo", "analiza la arquitectura del proyecto" o cualquier variante que implique explorar el código/estructura para inferir decisiones relevantes que merezcan un ADR. Activar también cuando el usuario llegue a un proyecto nuevo y quiera entender qué decisiones ya se tomaron, aunque no mencione explícitamente "ADR".
Structured debugging skill for methodical root cause analysis. Use when investigating bugs, unexpected behavior, or errors. Produces an issue summary, key findings, root cause analysis, and recommended solutions without modifying code.
Assesses the production viability of findings, filtering out debug-only features and assertion traps. Use when findings have been validated and you need to confirm they are triggerable in production release builds (with assertions disabled). Don't use for writing reproduction scripts or patches.
This skill is used when users want to review an existing code segment with an Agent — examining code rationality and identifying refactoring opportunities. It is language-neutral and focuses on design-level judgments (rather than correctness/mechanical checks). By default, it provides conversational conclusions and does not modify files proactively; hierarchical reports can be generated for archiving or large-scale code inspections, and findings can be reviewed item by item if there are multiple ones. Trigger: Users say "review / refactor / check if this code is reasonable / review with me / is there any problem with this design"; after writing a batch of code continuously, users or Agents can actively ask if inspection is needed. Not applicable: Executing single-point modifications with clear instructions from users (e.g., "change data1 to user_data"), adding new features, fixing bugs, performance tuning (profile/benchmark special projects), security audits, deterministic mechanical checks like lint, rewriting, or step-by-step inquiries (explaining code).
Review the current Pull Request that has been checked out locally with structured feedback on code quality, issues, testing, and suggestions. Use when you need a comprehensive code review of a PR branch.