Loading...
Loading...
Found 34 Skills
Critical-thinking brainstorming partner that acts as a requirements analyst. Use when users present ideas, feature requests, or problems they want to solve. Triggers include "I want to build", "help me validate", "users need", "I'm thinking of creating", or any request involving problem/solution validation. This skill aggressively challenges assumptions, questions perceived problems, demands evidence, and ensures solutions address genuine needs before exploring implementation.
Ask structured questions one at a time to gather requirements, context, or clarification. Each question includes the intention behind it and current assumptions. Use when the user wants to be interviewed about a topic, gather requirements, or needs help thinking through a problem step by step.
Analyzes fundamental questions and concepts through philosophical lens using logic, epistemology, metaphysics, and critical analysis frameworks. Provides insights on meaning, truth, knowledge, existence, reasoning, and conceptual clarity. Use when: Conceptual ambiguity, logical arguments, foundational assumptions, meaning questions. Evaluates: Validity, soundness, coherence, assumptions, implications, conceptual clarity.
Grill the user's plans, decisions, or ideas layer by layer. Use this when the user wants to stress-test their thinking or uses any 'grill' trigger phrase.
Think carefully no matter what question you answer. Before answering any question or performing any task, conduct in-depth analysis and reasoning first.
Deep Reading Collaborative System: A system leveraging multi-layered AI Agents to help transform articles from "read" to "understood" to "mastered", and convert knowledge into actionable plans. Use this system when you need to deeply understand complex articles/papers, systematically organize reading notes, think critically about content, discover hidden logical issues and assumptions, or turn knowledge into action plans. Trigger keywords: deep reading, critical thinking, reading notes, article analysis, Socratic questioning, action plan
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
Press a decision you just made until you can explain it to a skeptic in your own words, or surface the gap where you can't. The Feynman test aimed at a choice: understanding is cheapest to fake the moment after you decide, so a fresh critic presses for what you can't actually explain. Use right after picking an option, especially one an agent laid out without arguing for.
Calibrated grilling session for stress-testing a plan, design, idea, or decision. First assesses the user's topic knowledge, confidence, and desired pressure level, then asks one question at a time with recommended answers. Use when user says "grill me", "stress-test this", "challenge my plan", "interview me", or wants a plan probed without being overwhelmed.
Socratic questioning to examine beliefs, uncover assumptions, and develop deeper understanding. Use to challenge thinking, evaluate proposals, or teach without lecturing.
Apply Hegelian dialectics (thesis-antithesis-synthesis) to analyze contradictions and generate higher-order understanding. Use this skill when the user needs to resolve opposing viewpoints, find creative synthesis between conflicting positions, or move past binary thinking — even if they say 'both sides have valid points', 'how do we reconcile these views', or 'is there a third option'.
A deterministic thinking partner that challenges assumptions and applies mental models to sharpen decisions, solve problems, and think more clearly. Use this skill whenever a user says "help me think through X", "challenge my thinking", "what am I missing", "apply mental models to this", "play devil's advocate", "stress test this idea", "poke holes in my plan", "help me decide between X and Y", "what are the second-order effects", "I'm stuck on a decision", names any specific model (SWOT, first principles, inversion, pre-mortem, etc.), or asks for structured reasoning on any ambiguous, high-stakes, or complex problem. Also trigger when the user seems uncertain, is rationalizing, or is asking "am I thinking about this right?" Even casual phrases like "what do you think about..." on non-trivial topics should trigger this skill.