Loading...
Loading...
Found 28 Skills
Structured meeting summaries with action items, decisions, and key discussion points. Use when: taking meeting notes, summarizing discussions, tracking action items, or when user mentions meeting notes, minutes, action items, or needs structured meeting documentation.
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Routes human attention to decisions that matter in agent-generated code. Active during planning, implementing, fixing. Defines when and how to place DECISION markers in code comments. Also applies when reviewing a diff/PR on request.
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning, clarifying implementation decisions, or exploring gray areas for a phase. Triggers include "discuss phase", "clarify phase", "gather context", "what are the gray areas", and "phase discussion".
Add ADR references to code for traceability. TRIGGERS - ADR traceability, code reference, document decision in code.
Creates structured Request for Comments (RFC) documents for proposing and deciding on significant changes. Use when the user says "write an RFC", "create a proposal", "I need to propose a change", "draft an RFC", "document a decision", or needs stakeholder alignment before making a major technical or process decision. Do NOT use for TDDs/implementation docs (use technical-design-doc-creator instead), README files, or general documentation.
Create structured technology trade-off analysis documents with scored comparison matrices. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compare technologies, evaluate architectural options, analyze build-vs-buy decisions, assess migration strategies, or produce any decision document that compares multiple approaches across weighted dimensions. Triggers on: 'trade-off analysis', 'tradeoff', 'comparison matrix', 'evaluate options', 'which technology should we use', 'compare approaches', 'pros and cons of', 'build vs buy', 'migration analysis', 'consolidation analysis', 'technology selection'. Also use when the user has completed technical research and wants to structure findings into a decision document.
Byzantine consensus voting for multi-agent decision making. Implements voting protocols, conflict resolution, and agreement algorithms for reaching consensus among multiple agents.
Resolve implementation ambiguities before planning begins. Two modes: Discussion mode surfaces gray areas with concrete options for greenfield work. Assumptions mode reads the codebase, forms evidence-based opinions, and asks the user to correct only what's wrong (brownfield work). Use for "discuss ambiguities", "resolve gray areas", "clarify before planning", "assumptions mode", "what are the gray areas", "before we plan". Do NOT use for broad design exploration (use feature-design) or for planning itself (use feature-plan).
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Align stakeholders and secure buy-in by producing a Stakeholder Alignment Pack (alignment brief, stakeholder map, exec decision principles, pre-brief plan, alignment meeting plan, decision summary + comms). Use for stakeholder alignment, buy-in, executive alignment, cross-functional alignment. Category: Communication.
Run high-signal design reviews (design critique / design crit / design feedback) by producing a Design Review Pack: review brief + requested feedback, agenda + facilitation script, feedback log prioritized by Value→Ease→Delight, decision record, and follow-up plan.