Loading...
Loading...
Found 9 Skills
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Compare GWAS studies, perform meta-analyses, and assess replication across cohorts. Integrates NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog and Open Targets Genetics to compare study designs, effect sizes, ancestry diversity, and heterogeneity statistics. Use when comparing GWAS studies for a trait, performing meta-analysis of genetic loci, assessing replication across cohorts, or exploring the genetic architecture of complex diseases.
Synthesize multiple media analyses into cross-source patterns and insights. Use when you need to cross-reference analyses, find patterns across sources, or perform meta-analysis of media content.
Read an academic paper end to end and extract professional research insights, figures, metadata, and critique. Use this skill whenever the user shares a scientific paper, review paper, survey paper, systematic review, meta-analysis, scoping review, arXiv link, DOI, PDF, or pasted paper text and asks to read, summarize, analyze, extract, digest, review, critique, or explain it. For original research papers, produce a modified Heilmeier analysis. For review literature, produce a field-map extraction covering scope, taxonomy, evidence quality, consensus, controversies, gaps, and future directions. Do NOT use this skill for non-academic articles, blog posts, or news.
Apply meta-analysis to synthesize effect sizes across multiple studies, assess heterogeneity, and evaluate publication bias. Use this skill when the user needs to combine findings from prior research, compare fixed-effect vs random-effects models, compute pooled effect sizes, or when they ask 'what does the overall evidence say', 'how do I combine results across studies', or 'is there publication bias'.
Systematically appraise network meta-analysis papers using integrated 200-point checklist (PRISMA-NMA, NICE DSU TSD 7, ISPOR-AMCP-NPC, CINeMA) with triple-validation methodology, automated PDF extraction, semantic evidence matching, and concordance analysis. Use when evaluating NMA quality for peer review, guideline development, HTA, or reimbursement decisions.
Codex-native Academic Research Skills suite for deep research, academic paper writing, manuscript review, full research-to-paper pipelines, and experiment planning or validation. Use when the user asks for deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, research question refinement, academic paper drafting, paper revision, citation or integrity checks, reviewer simulation, peer review, editorial decision letters, research-to-paper workflows, experiment execution planning, statistical interpretation, or human study protocol support. Also use for Claude-style ARS command aliases such as /ars-plan, ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, and /ars-full. This skill vendors ARS role prompts, references, templates, and shared handoff schemas under ars/.
Search PubMed for meta-analyses on a given medical topic using NCBI E-utilities API
Use when formulating clinical research questions (PICOT framework), evaluating health evidence quality (study design hierarchy, bias assessment, GRADE), prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, assessing regulatory evidence, or when user mentions clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, health research methodology, systematic reviews, research protocols, or study quality assessment.