Loading...
Loading...
Found 488 Skills
Help users create high-quality skills by discovering and incorporating proven methodologies from domain experts. Use this skill BEFORE skill-creator when users want to create a new skill - it enhances skill-creator by first identifying expert frameworks and best practices to incorporate. Triggers on requests like "help me create a skill for X" or "I want to make a skill that does Y". This skill guides methodology selection, then hands off to skill-creator for the actual skill generation.
QA an analysis before sharing -- methodology, accuracy, and bias checks. Use when reviewing an analysis before a stakeholder presentation, spot-checking calculations and aggregation logic, verifying a SQL query's results look right, or assessing whether conclusions are actually supported by the data.
Four common skill archetypes with structure templates - CLI reference, methodology, safety/security, and orchestration. Use when creating new skills to select appropriate structure.
Define your Method — the unique methodology you use to deliver your transformation. This is the third element of the World Code framework. Use when someone says "define my method", "my methodology", "how I solve problems", "unique approach", or "method element".
Barry 英文沟通方法论资源包。给 barry-coach、barry-logic-training、barry-speech-training、barry-translation-training、barry-logic-to-speech 提供随 npx skills 一起安装的 methodology wiki。一般不直接调用。
Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
Bootstrap/refresh MSG Architect methodology in AGENTS.md; show a review-first diff, validate, then self-remove.
Activate this skill when users fall into "analysis paralysis" (want to act but dare not take action) or "blind action" (act without summarization or improvement). Typical trigger signals: "I need to finish my research before starting", "I don't know if I understand this industry well enough to start a business", "We've been doing things but have no methodology". Scenarios where it is not called: Scenarios where mature methodologies are already in effective operation, pure theoretical learning needs. Difference from "Seeking Truth from Facts Information Processing Method": This skill focuses on the complete cognitive cycle (practice - cognition - re-practice), while the latter focuses on specific techniques of information processing in a single cycle.
Use this skill when the user wants to deeply analyse a single academic paper — beyond summarising, into methodology validity, contribution clarity, and implications. Triggers include "analyse this paper", "break down this paper", "what are the weaknesses of X", "Heilmeier catechism on this paper", "critically read this", or providing a PDF/arXiv link for deep reading. Do not use for surveys across multiple papers — use literature-review instead.
Barry's always-on Q&A coach for the English communication methodology. Learners can invoke it at any time to answer four types of questions: ① English expressions, words, translations, and business usage (the AI answers directly + adds a 5-column bilingual entry + asks whether to add it to fancy-vocab); ② methodology concepts (reads the corresponding source text from the methodology wiki installed with the toolkit and answers through RAG, then adapts its expression to Barry's style after understanding it); ③ training difficulties (diagnoses them with the methodology framework + gives concrete next steps); ④ changes in circumstances (new job/progress/new goal) → guides the learner to run /barry-onboarding to reassess their profile. **It does not edit the learner's profile, perform assessments, or persist Q&A logs.** Barry style (direct, conversational, willing to take a stance, always provides examples). Trigger phrases: ask a question, can I ask you something, coach, barry coach, /barry-coach, how do I say this in English, what does this mean, how do I translate this, methodology, how do I practice X, what level am I, what are A1/A2/B1/B2/C1/C2.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.