Loading...
Loading...
Found 7 Skills
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.
Stress-test plans, proposals, and strategies. Use for pre-mortems, assumption audits, risk registers, evaluating business ideas, identifying failure modes, or when you need devil's advocate analysis before committing resources.
Full discovery phase orchestrator. Brainstorm + ao search + research + plan + pre-mortem gate. Produces epic-id and execution-packet for /crank. Triggers: "discovery", "discover", "explore and plan", "research and plan", "discovery phase".
Guides failure-prevention culture and operational excellence for mission-critical engineering— zero-defect aspiration vs error budgets; HRO principles; defense-in-depth; fail-safe/fail-closed; verification gates and independent checks; redundancy and graceful degradation; pre-mortems and FMEA; stop-the-line; defect escape, near-miss, and repeat-incident metrics; leadership against normalization of deviance—not blame culture. Use for failure-prevention programs, HRO practices, verification gates, fail-safe design, pre-mortem/FMEA, stop-the-line, near-miss reporting, or defect-escape metrics—not SRE error budgets only (site-reliability-engineer), incident command only (incident-management-engineer), backup/restore only (cyber-resilience-engineer), CI lint only (build-validator), agile coaching, HR discipline, or classified ATO without ops-excellence lens (classified-cyber-security-senior-manager).
Challenges AI-generated plans, code, designs, and decisions before you commit. Pairs with any other skill as a review layer. Uses pre-mortem analysis, inversion thinking, and Socratic questioning to find what AI missed — blind spots, hidden assumptions, failure modes, and optimistic shortcuts. The skill that asks "are you sure about that?" so you don't have to. Triggers on: "challenge this", "devils advocate", "stress test this plan", "what could go wrong", "poke holes in this", "review this critically", "second opinion on this design", "what am I missing". Use this skill when you need critical review of any AI-generated output, architecture decision, implementation plan, or code before committing to it.
Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, stress test assumptions, audit evidence quality, or find blind spots before committing. Do NOT use for building plans, making decisions, or generating solutions — this skill only challenges and critiques.
Original prompt text for the Inversion method. Use it when the user is worried that a plan has pitfalls, wants to defuse risks in advance, prepare a risk contingency plan, or test the robustness of a plan. Trigger words include 逆向法 (inversion), 怎么会失败 (how could it fail), 提前排雷 (defuse risks in advance), 风险预案 (risk contingency), 什么会出错 (what could go wrong), 怎么才能搞砸 (how to screw it up), 反面思考 (backward thinking), inversion, 防护措施 (safeguards), 保证失败 (guarantee failure). Output: a list of guaranteed-failure moves, the flipped rules, the single most easily overlooked rule, and one safeguard action you can take right now. Complements first principles: first principles digs down to the essence and rebuilds from scratch, while inversion works backward from failure to find the defenses.