Loading...
Loading...
Found 37 Skills
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
Guides Claude from idea to working prototype using frameworks from OpenAI, Figma, and Airbnb. Use when starting new product features, planning MVP scope, making build-vs-buy decisions, or guiding users from concept to shippable prototype. Applies AI-first thinking (Kevin Weil), simplicity forcing functions (Dylan Field), and complete experience design (Brian Chesky).
How to design formats that succeed — simplicity, community, timing
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for correctness, security, architecture, conventions, simplicity, UX, reliability, telemetry, testing, compatibility, and documentation review.
Human Made engineering principles and code quality standards. Apply when writing code, reviewing code, planning implementations, or discussing architecture. Covers code quality priorities, simplicity over complexity, and avoiding over-engineering.
Critiques an implementation plan — or a wayfinder map/ticket — from multiple angles (security, simplicity, edge cases, scope creep, codebase conflicts, tech-specific best practices) via parallel critic subagents. Trigger: user says "kritisiere den plan", "plan check", "plan-kritik", "blinde flecken", "/plan-critics" — also invoke when a planning agent wants to validate its own plan before presenting it, or a wayfinder session wants a resolution checked before closing a ticket. Must be called at top-level (not inside a subagent) — it uses the Task tool.
Best practices for LLM-assisted coding. Declarative workflows, simplicity, tenacity.
Designs intuitive Python library APIs following principles of simplicity, consistency, and discoverability. Handles API evolution, deprecation, breaking changes, and error handling. Use when designing new library APIs, reviewing existing APIs for improvements, or managing API versioning and deprecations.
Brutally honest code review in the style of Linus Torvalds, focusing on data structures, simplicity, and pragmatism. Use when you want critical, no-nonsense feedback that prioritizes engineering fundamentals over style preferences.
When writing or reviewing code to prevent over-engineering and speculative features. Use when the user says "is this over-engineered," "do we need this," "should I add," "future-proof," or "just in case." For simplicity concerns, see kiss. For abstraction design, see solid.
Use when asked to "set OKRs", "objectives and key results", "quarterly OKR planning", "align objectives", "measure OKR progress", or "focus priorities with OKRs". Helps teams focus on what matters most and create a cadence of progress. The OKR framework (originated by Andy Grove at Intel, popularized by John Doerr at Google) creates alignment, focus, and learning cycles. Christina Wodtke's Radical Focus approach emphasizes simplicity and avoiding common pitfalls.