Loading...
Loading...
Found 12 Skills
Direct REST API access to PubMed. Advanced Boolean/MeSH queries, E-utilities API, batch processing, citation management. For Python workflows, prefer biopython (Bio.Entrez). Use this for direct HTTP/REST work or custom API implementations.
Use this when the user explicitly requests to "verify/optimize in-text citations of the `{topic}_review.tex` review" or to "run check-review-alignment". Use the host AI's semantic understanding to verify each citation against the literature content one by one. **Only when fatal citation errors are found**, make minimal rewrites to the "sentences containing citations", and reuse the rendering script of `systematic-literature-review` to output PDF/Word (the script does not directly call the LLM API locally). Core principle: **Do not modify for the sake of modifying**. When it is uncertain whether it is a fatal error, keep the original content and issue a warning in the report. ⚠️ Not applicable in the following cases: - The user only wants to generate the main body of a systematic review (should use systematic-literature-review) - The user only wants to add/verify BibTeX entries (should use a dedicated bib management process)
Systematic literature review workflow: scope, search (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar), screen, extract, synthesize, and identify gaps. Triggers on: "literature review", "survey the literature", "related work", "systematic review", "synthesize the research", "find papers about", "research gap analysis".
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
Search PubMed for meta-analyses on a given medical topic using NCBI E-utilities API
Use when formulating clinical research questions (PICOT framework), evaluating health evidence quality (study design hierarchy, bias assessment, GRADE), prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, assessing regulatory evidence, or when user mentions clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, health research methodology, systematic reviews, research protocols, or study quality assessment.
Complete literature retrieval capability combining search and filter skills. LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User needs "文獻檢索", "找文獻", "retrieve literature", "系統性搜尋" | starting systematic review | comprehensive literature search. CAPABILITIES: Multi-database search, MeSH expansion, quality filtering, PRISMA-compliant workflow. COMPOSITE SKILL: Combines literature-search + literature-filter.
Extract study data into a structured table (`papers/extraction_table.csv`) using the protocol’s extraction schema. **Trigger**: extraction form, extraction table, data extraction, 信息提取, 提取表. **Use when**: systematic review 在 screening 后进入 extraction（C3），需要把纳入论文按字段落到 CSV 以支持后续 synthesis。 **Skip if**: 还没有 `papers/screening_log.csv` 或 protocol 未锁定。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 严格按 schema 填字段；不要在此阶段写 narrative synthesis（那是 `synthesis-writer`）。
You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.
13 deep research & systematic reviews skills. Trigger: systematic reviews, multi-source synthesis, comprehensive literature surveys. Design: multi-step research protocols with quality assessment and evidence grading.