Loading...
Loading...
Found 9 Skills
Direct REST API access to PubMed. Advanced Boolean/MeSH queries, E-utilities API, batch processing, citation management. For Python workflows, prefer biopython (Bio.Entrez). Use this for direct HTTP/REST work or custom API implementations.
Use when formulating clinical research questions (PICOT framework), evaluating health evidence quality (study design hierarchy, bias assessment, GRADE), prioritizing patient-important outcomes, conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses, creating evidence summaries for guidelines, assessing regulatory evidence, or when user mentions clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, health research methodology, systematic reviews, research protocols, or study quality assessment.
Use this when the user explicitly requests to "verify/optimize in-text citations of the `{topic}_review.tex` review" or to "run check-review-alignment". Use the host AI's semantic understanding to verify each citation against the literature content one by one. **Only when fatal citation errors are found**, make minimal rewrites to the "sentences containing citations", and reuse the rendering script of `systematic-literature-review` to output PDF/Word (the script does not directly call the LLM API locally). Core principle: **Do not modify for the sake of modifying**. When it is uncertain whether it is a fatal error, keep the original content and issue a warning in the report. ⚠️ Not applicable in the following cases: - The user only wants to generate the main body of a systematic review (should use systematic-literature-review) - The user only wants to add/verify BibTeX entries (should use a dedicated bib management process)
Use when "literature review", "research synthesis", "systematic review", "academic search", or asking about "find papers", "cite sources", "research gaps", "meta-analysis", "bibliography"
Search PubMed for meta-analyses on a given medical topic using NCBI E-utilities API
Extract study data into a structured table (`papers/extraction_table.csv`) using the protocol’s extraction schema. **Trigger**: extraction form, extraction table, data extraction, 信息提取, 提取表. **Use when**: systematic review 在 screening 后进入 extraction（C3），需要把纳入论文按字段落到 CSV 以支持后续 synthesis。 **Skip if**: 还没有 `papers/screening_log.csv` 或 protocol 未锁定。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 严格按 schema 填字段；不要在此阶段写 narrative synthesis（那是 `synthesis-writer`）。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
You must use this when conducting PRISMA-standard systematic reviews, protocol development, or Risk of Bias assessment.
Complete literature retrieval capability combining search and filter skills. LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User needs "文獻檢索", "找文獻", "retrieve literature", "系統性搜尋" | starting systematic review | comprehensive literature search. CAPABILITIES: Multi-database search, MeSH expansion, quality filtering, PRISMA-compliant workflow. COMPOSITE SKILL: Combines literature-search + literature-filter.