Loading...
Loading...
Found 34 Skills
Comprehensive guide to stretchr/testify for Golang testing. Covers assert, require, mock, and suite packages in depth. Use whenever writing tests with testify, creating mocks, setting up test suites, or choosing between assert and require. Essential for testify assertions, mock expectations, argument matchers, call verification, suite lifecycle, and advanced patterns like Eventually, JSONEq, and custom matchers. Trigger on any Go test file importing testify.
Worker that runs existing tests to catch regressions. Auto-detects framework, reports pass/fail. No status changes or task creation.
Performs manual testing of Story AC via executable bash scripts saved to tests/manual/. Creates reusable test suites per Story. Worker for ln-510.
Design comprehensive test cases using PICT (Pairwise Independent Combinatorial Testing) for any piece of requirements or code. Analyzes inputs, generates PICT models with parameters, values, and constraints for valid scenarios using pairwise testing. Outputs the PICT model, markdown table of test cases, and expected results.
Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.
Test quality inspection framework for reviewing test coverage, identifying gaps, and ensuring comprehensive validation
This skill should be used when performing AI-powered mutation testing to evaluate and improve unit test quality. It generates targeted code mutants, runs tests to identify surviving mutants, and strengthens or creates tests to kill them. Accepts a file path, directory, or defaults to git diff changed files.
Deep formal test smell audit based on academic research taxonomy (testsmells.org). Detects 19 categorized smell types — conditional logic, mystery guests, sensitive equality, eager tests, and more — with calibrated severity and research-backed remediation. Use for comprehensive test suite health assessments. For a quick pragmatic review, use test-anti-patterns instead. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), evaluating assertion quality specifically (use assertion-quality), or finding test duplication and boilerplate (use exp-test-maintainability).
Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "I can't understand what this test is doing", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.
Analyzes test suites and tags each test with a standardized set of traits (e.g., positive, negative, critical-path, boundary, smoke, regression). Use when the user wants to categorize, audit, or label tests with traits. Do not use for writing new tests, running tests, or migrating test frameworks.
Review whole-repo test quality, rerun coverage, score remaining worth-testing files, inspect slow-drift and stale test debt, and publish the next testing batch. Use every few weeks or before large breaking changes and rearchitecture.
Use when setting up Playwright test projects and organizing test suites with proper configuration and project structure.