Loading...
Loading...
Found 25 Skills
Mandatory code reviews via /code-review before commits and deploys
Best practices for working with Cursor. Use when learning how to effectively use Cursor features or optimizing your workflow.
Entrypoint for AI coding assistant rule authoring across GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code. USE FOR: setting up rules, reviewing existing rules, scaffolding instruction files, or asking which editor format to use. DO NOT USE FOR: authoring skills (SKILL.md), agent definitions (.agent.md), or CI enforcement of rule files.
Run Claude Code CLI for complex tasks, code generation, analysis, and research. Uses Anthropic OAuth (included in Claude Pro). Use for extended thinking, code review, architecture decisions. Preferred for load balancing sub-agent work (35% weight).
Comprehensive knowledge of amplihack framework architecture, patterns, and usage
Delegate coding, review, diagnosis, planning, structured output, and native browser research tasks to independent Codex sessions via Codex CLI. Use cases include creating new tasks with `codex exec`, resuming multi-turn sessions with `codex exec resume`, performing read-only reviews with `codex exec review`, as well as scenarios requiring `--json` event streams, `-o` final message persistence, image input, or Computer Use browser operations.
Create, audit, and maintain CLAUDE.md documentation files that configure Claude Code for projects. Use this skill when (1) initializing a new project with Claude Code configuration, (2) reviewing or improving existing CLAUDE.md files, (3) organizing project instructions using progressive disclosure patterns, (4) converting repeated instructions into permanent documentation, or (5) setting up agent_docs/ structures for larger codebases. Handles the WHAT/WHY/HOW framework, conciseness optimization, and file import patterns.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "use Codex", "ask Codex", "consult Codex", "use GPT for planning", "ask GPT to review", "get GPT's opinion", "what does GPT think", "second opinion on code", "consult the oracle", "ask the oracle", or mentions using an AI oracle for planning or code review. NOT for implementation tasks.
Ultra-lightweight channel for feature workflows: No need to write design docs, checklists, or conduct phased reviews. Let AI write code directly as it normally would, but before it starts, tell it where the CodeStable knowledge base in the project is and how to search it. This way, the code it writes will have fewer pitfalls and be more consistent with project conventions. Trigger scenarios: Users say "fast mode", "fastforward", "skip all those steps", "just start coding", "help me make xxx" and the requirement is too small to go through the design process.
Use RepoPrompt CLI for token-efficient codebase exploration
Codexにセカンドオピニオンを求める。AI同士の忖度なしガチレビュー。Use when user mentions 'Codex レビュー', 'セカンドオピニオン', 'Codex の意見', 'Codex でレビュー', or 'Codex セットアップ'. Do NOT load for: 'Codex に実装させて', 'Codex Worker', 'Codex に作らせて', '実装を依頼'.
Use PAL MCP to orchestrate multiple AI models (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, Ollama) for code reviews, debugging, planning, and CLI bridging