Loading...
Loading...
Found 6 Skills
Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.
Interactive debate and argument practice with structured feedback, counterargument generation, logical fallacy identification, and scoring rubrics. Use when preparing for debates, improving persuasion skills, or practicing argumentation.
Develop argumentation skills with structured debate preparation
Use when reviewing or editing research manuscripts, journal articles, reviews, or perspectives. Invoke when user mentions manuscript, paper draft, article, research writing, journal submission, reviewer feedback, or needs to improve scientific writing clarity, structure, or argumentation in their manuscript.
Rigorous reasoning using philosophical theories and scientific methods. Use this skill when analyzing logic, evaluating arguments, constructing proofs, critiquing opinions, or solving complex problems requiring critical thinking. Triggers - debate, proof, critique, logical analysis, argument evaluation, fallacy detection, inference, argumentation, logical fallacy, critical thinking.
Compose intellectually sophisticated persuasive essays using tripartite dialectical structure (establish-critique-synthesize), paradox accumulation, conversational register calibration, and strategic humility. Supports three atomic writing primitives (AGONAL α, MAIEUTIC β, APOPHATIC γ) with hypersoft plithogenic composition, plus legacy style modes and hybrid combinations. Triggers on requests for persuasive writing to mixed/skeptical audiences, defending counterintuitive claims, Socratic pedagogical dialogue, editorial first-person essays, or writing that must balance accessibility with depth. Implements recursive thematic anchoring, forced dilemma construction, and transformed return closure. Use when linear argumentation is insufficient and accumulated tension resolves through synthesis.